ArticleFly2018
A model-based high throughput method for fecundity estimation in fruit fly studies.
Article in Fly, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- MLDAAPP: machine learning data acquisition for assessing population phenotypes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Interactive effects of developmental and adult nutrition on lifespan and fecundity in a genetically diverse Drosophila population.PloS one · 2025Article
- Protocol: An absolute egg-to-adult viability assay inmicroPublication biology · 2025Article
- A High-Throughput Method for QuantifyingToxics · 2024Article
- A high-throughput method for quantifyingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Phenotyping ofBiomolecules · 2022Review
- Diverse biological processes coordinate the transcriptional response to nutritional changes in a Drosophila melanogaster multiparent population.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to quantify fecundity is critically important to a wide range of experimental applications, particularly in widely-used model organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster. However, the standard method of manually counting eggs is time consuming and limits the feasibility of large-scale experiments. We develop a predictive model to automate the counting of eggs from images of eggs removed from the media surface and washed onto dark filter paper. Our method uses the simple relationship between the white area in an image and the number of eggs present to create a predictive model that performs well even at high egg densities where clumping can complicate the individual identification of eggs. A cross-validation approach demonstrates our method performs well, with a correlation between predicted and manually counted values of 0.88. We show how this method can be applied to a large data set where egg densities vary widely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.