Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30579326›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2018

Comparative transcriptomics identifies patterns of selection in roses.

Shubin Li, Micai Zhong, Xue Dong, Xiaodong Jiang, Yuxing Xu, Yibo Sun, Fang Cheng, De-Zhu Li, Kaixue Tang, Siqing Wang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of a rambler rose,Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shubin LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation & Molecular Breeding, National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing Laboratory of Urban and Rural Ecological Environment, Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education, School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35 East Qinghua Road, Beijing, 100083, China.
Micai ZhongGroup of Plant Molecular Genetics and Adaptation, CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China.
Xue DongGroup of Plant Molecular Genetics and Adaptation, CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China.
Xiaodong JiangGroup of Plant Molecular Genetics and Adaptation, CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China.
Yuxing XuUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Yibo SunGroup of Plant Molecular Genetics and Adaptation, CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China.
Fang ChengGroup of Plant Molecular Genetics and Adaptation, CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China.
De-Zhu LiGermplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China.
Kaixue TangFlower Research Institute, Yunnan Agricultural Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650231, China.
Siqing WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation & Molecular Breeding, National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing Laboratory of Urban and Rural Ecological Environment, Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education, School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35 East Qinghua Road, Beijing, 100083, China. wangsiqing@sina.com.
Silan DaiBeijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation & Molecular Breeding, National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing Laboratory of Urban and Rural Ecological Environment, Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education, School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, 35 East Qinghua Road, Beijing, 100083, China. silandai@sina.com.
Jin-Yong HuGroup of Plant Molecular Genetics and Adaptation, CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China. hujinyong@mail.kib.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2187-9168
Kunming Institute of Botany · CNBeijing Forestry University · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNYunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

CAS Pioneer Hundred Talents Program 292015312D11035Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia (CAS) 000000National Natural Science Foundation of China 31501034National Natural Science Foundation of China 31570311National Natural Science Foundation of China 31660583Yunnan Recruitment Program of Experts in Science 000000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoses are important plants for human beings with pivotal economical and biological traits like continuous flowering, flower architecture, color and scent. Due to frequent hybridization and high genome heterozygosity, classification of roses and their relatives remains a big challenge.

resultsHere, to identify potential markers for phylogenetic reconstruction and to reveal the patterns of natural selection in roses, we generated sets of high quality and comprehensive reference transcriptomes for Rosa chinensis 'Old Blush' (OB) and R. wichuriana 'Basye's Thornless' (BT), two species exhibiting contrasted traits of high economical importance. The assembled reference transcriptomes showed transcripts N50 above 2000 bp. Two roses shared about 10,073 transcripts (N50 = 2282 bp), in which a set of 5959 transcripts was conserved within genera of Rosa. Further comparison with species in Rosaceae identified 4447 transcripts being common (Rosaceae-common) in Rosa, Malus, Prunus, Rubus, and Fragaria, while a pool of 164 transcripts being specific for roses (Rosa-specific). Among the Rosaceae-common transcripts, 409 transcripts showed a signature of positive selection and a clustered expression in different tissues. Interestingly, nine of these rapidly evolving genes were related to DNA damage repair and responses to environmental stimulus, a potential associated with genome confliction post hybridization. Coincident with this fast evolution pattern in rose genes, 24 F-box and four TMV resistant proteins were significantly enriched in the Rosa-specific genes.

conclusionsWe expect that these Rosaceae-common and Rosa-specific transcripts should facilitate the phylogenetic analysis of Rosaceae plants as well as investigations of Rosa-specific biology. The data reported here could provide fundamental genomic tools and knowledge critical for understanding the biology and domestication of roses and for roses breeding.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGenes, PlantHybridization, GeneticPhylogenyRosaRosaceaSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNATranscriptomeComparative transcriptomicsRosaceae-commonRosa sp.Rosa-specificSelection pattern

Identifiers

PMID30579326
PMCPMC6303930
OpenAlexW2906635573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.