ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2018
Machine Learning Models for Genetic Risk Assessment of Infants with Non-syndromic Orofacial Cleft.
Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cleft Lip and/or Cleft Palate in Diagnosis and Detection-An Umbrella Review.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- The Evolution of Gene Sequencing Technologies: Unveiling Genetic Architecture of Nonsyndromic Orofacial Clefts.Genetics research · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence applications in the diagnosis and management of cleft lip and palate: An updated review.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Review
- Functional Validation of Noncoding Variants Associated With Nonsyndromic Orofacial Cleft.Human mutation · 2025Review
- Proteomic analysis illustrates the potential involvement of motor proteins in cleft palate development.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Triangulating nutrigenomics, metabolomics and microbiomics toward personalized nutrition and healthy living.Human genomics · 2023Review
- Updates in Cleft Care.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2023Review
- Genetic Risk Assessment of Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip with or without Cleft Palate by Linking Genetic Networks and Deep Learning Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Risk score prediction model based on single nucleotide polymorphism for predicting malaria: a machine learning approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Where Is the Artificial Intelligence Applied in Dentistry? Systematic Review and Literature Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Personalized nutrition: A review of genotype-based nutritional supplementation.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthodontics: a scoping review.Progress in orthodontics · 2021Article
- Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cleft Care: A Scoping Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Environmental mechanisms of orofacial clefts.Birth defects research · 2020Review
- Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting the Recurrence of Stage IV Colorectal Cancer After Tumor Resection.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Association of Nucleotide Variants of GRHL3, IRF6, NAT2, SDC2, BCL3, and PVRL1 Genes with Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip With/Without Cleft Palate in Multigenerational Families: A Retrospective Study.Contemporary clinical dentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The isolated type of orofacial cleft, termed non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P), is the second most common birth defect in China, with Asians having the highest incidence in the world. NSCL/P involves multiple genes and complex interactions between genetic and environmental factors, imposing difficulty for the genetic assessment of the unborn fetus carrying multiple NSCL/P-susceptible variants. Although genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have uncovered dozens of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci in different ethnic populations, the genetic diagnostic effectiveness of these SNPs requires further experimental validation in Chinese populations before a diagnostic panel or a predictive model covering multiple SNPs can be built. In this study, we collected blood samples from control and NSCL/P infants in Han and Uyghur Chinese populations to validate the diagnostic effectiveness of 43 candidate SNPs previously detected using GWAS. We then built predictive models with the validated SNPs using different machine learning algorithms and evaluated their prediction performance. Our results showed that logistic regression had the best performance for risk assessment according to the area under curve. Notably, defective variants in MTHFR and RBP4, two genes involved in folic acid and vitamin A biosynthesis, were found to have high contributions to NSCL/P incidence based on feature importance evaluation with logistic regression. This is consistent with the notion that folic acid and vitamin A are both essential nutritional supplements for pregnant women to reduce the risk of conceiving an NSCL/P baby. Moreover, we observed a lower predictive power in Uyghur than in Han cases, likely due to differences in genetic background between these two ethnic populations. Thus, our study highlights the urgency to generate the HapMap for Uyghur population and perform resequencing-based screening of Uyghur-specific NSCL/P markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.