Trial reportThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2019
Evaluation of clinical benefit from treatment with mepolizumab for patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.
Trial report in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis in Subjects Receiving Standard of Care Therapy
Beyond Eosinophils: Proteomics to Identify Potential Biomarkers of Organ Damage and Response to MEPOLIZUMAB in EGPA
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Evidence-Based Guideline for the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2023Guideline
- Anti-cytokine targeted therapies for ANCA-associated vasculitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Guideline for the use of immunobiologicals in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in Brazil.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyGuideline
- Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Mepolizumab in Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Trial
- Advances in the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
- Identification of clinical-biological endophenotypes in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis using unsupervised machine learning: a real-world study.Respiratory research · 2026Observational
- Real-world outcomes and corticosteroid sparing with mepolizumab for EGPA or HES.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Mepolizumab initiation by day 30 and glucocorticoid exposure in newly diagnosed EGPA: a single-center 30-day landmark cohort study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Burden of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis by disease phase and steroid-sparing effects of biologics: a real-world retrospective study in Europe.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Impact of mepolizumab on the AAV-PRO questionnaire in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: data from a European multicentre study.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- A case of hereditary alpha tryptasemia and presumptive eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025Article
- Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: Patient profiles from a large US allergy practice.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025Article
- Improving patient outcomes: Mepolizumab's impact in IL-5-mediated diseases.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2025Article
- The management of type 2 inflammatory respiratory diseases: a Chinese expert consensus [2024].Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- Review
- Biologics in Hypereosinophilic Syndrome and Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
- Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis developed during treatment with benralizmab for severe asthma: A case report and literature review.Respirology case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byReply.2019
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2021
Authors and funding
16 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn a recent phase III trial (NCT02020889) 53% of mepolizumab-treated versus 19% of placebo-treated patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) achieved protocol-defined remission.
objectiveWe sought to investigate post hoc the clinical benefit of mepolizumab in patients with EGPA using a comprehensive definition of benefit encompassing remission, oral glucocorticoid (OGC) dose reduction, and EGPA relapses.
methodsThe randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial recruited patients with relapsing/refractory EGPA receiving stable OGCs (prednisolone/prednisone, ≥7.5-50 mg/d) for 4 or more weeks. Patients received 300 mg of subcutaneous mepolizumab or placebo every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Clinical benefit was defined post hoc as follows: remission at any time (2 definitions used), 50% or greater OGC dose reduction during weeks 48 to 52, or no EGPA relapses. The 2 remission definitions were Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score of 0 plus OGC dose of 4 mg/d or less (remission 1/clinical benefit 1) or 7.5 mg/d or less (remission 2/clinical benefit 2). Clinical benefit was assessed in all patients and among subgroups with a baseline blood eosinophil count of less than 150 cells/μL, baseline OGC dosage of greater than 20 mg/d, or weight of greater than 85 kg.
resultsWith mepolizumab versus placebo, 78% versus 32% of patients experienced clinical benefit 1, and 87% versus 53% of patients experienced clinical benefit 2 (both P < .001). Significantly more patients experienced clinical benefit 1 with mepolizumab versus placebo in the blood eosinophil count less than 150 cells/μL subgroup (72% vs 43%, P = .033) and weight greater than 85 kg subgroup (68% vs 23%, P = .005); in the OGC greater than 20 mg/d subgroup, results were not significant but favored mepolizumab (60% vs 36%, P = .395).
conclusionWhen a comprehensive definition of clinical benefit was applied to data from a randomized controlled trial, 78% to 87% of patients with EGPA experienced benefit with mepolizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.