Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30578883›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2019

Evaluation of clinical benefit from treatment with mepolizumab for patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

Jonathan Steinfeld, Eric S Bradford, Judith Brown, Stephen Mallett, Steven W Yancey, Praveen Akuthota, Maria C Cid, Gerald J Gleich, David Jayne, Paneez Khoury and 6 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02020889 phase3completednot on this map

A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis in Subjects Receiving Standard of Care Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2014 to 2016Enrolled136ConditionsChurg-Strauss SyndromeArmsMepolizumab, Placebo
NCT07343661 phase4enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Beyond Eosinophils: Proteomics to Identify Potential Biomarkers of Organ Damage and Response to MEPOLIZUMAB in EGPA

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di CagliariRan2025 to 2028Enrolled90ConditionsEGPA - Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis, Severe Asthma, Eosinophilic AsthmaArmsMepolizumab 100 MG Injection [Nucala], Mepolizumab 300 mg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Anti-cytokine targeted therapies for ANCA-associated vasculitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Real-world outcomes and corticosteroid sparing with mepolizumab for EGPA or HES.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Improving patient outcomes: Mepolizumab's impact in IL-5-mediated diseases.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Jonathan SteinfeldRespiratory TAU & Flexible Discovery Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, Pa.
Eric S BradfordRespiratory Therapeutic Area, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Judith BrownResearch and Development, Immuno-Inflammation TAU, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
Stephen MallettResearch & Development, Statistics, Programming and Data Standards, GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
Steven W YanceyRespiratory Therapeutic Area, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Praveen AkuthotaDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.
Maria C CidDepartment of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Gerald J GleichDepartments of Dermatology and Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
David JayneDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Paneez KhouryHuman Eosinophil Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
Carol A LangfordDepartment of Rheumatic and Immunologic Diseases, Center for Vasculitis Care and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Peter A MerkelDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Frank MoosigRheumazentrum, Schleswig-Holstein Mitte, Neumünster, Germany.
Ulrich SpecksDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Peter F WellerDivisions of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Michael E WechslerDepartment of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo. Electronic address: wechslerm@njhealth.org.
GlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USCleveland Clinic · USConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBHadassah Medical Center · ILMayo Clinic in Arizona · USNational Institutes of Health · USNational Jewish Health · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
Anti IL5 and Churg Strauss Syndrome: a double blind, placebo controlled trialU01AI097073 · NIAID · NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH · PI WECHSLER, MICHAEL E · 2013 to 2016
$5.8M
Human Eosinophils: Mechanisms of FunctioningR37AI020241 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI WELLER, PETER F · 2010 to 2019
$4.5M
HUMAN EOSINOPHILS: MECHANISMS OF FUNCTIONINGR01AI020241 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI WELLER, PETER F · 1985 to 2009
$3.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI020241NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI020241NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI097073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a recent phase III trial (NCT02020889) 53% of mepolizumab-treated versus 19% of placebo-treated patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) achieved protocol-defined remission.

objectiveWe sought to investigate post hoc the clinical benefit of mepolizumab in patients with EGPA using a comprehensive definition of benefit encompassing remission, oral glucocorticoid (OGC) dose reduction, and EGPA relapses.

methodsThe randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial recruited patients with relapsing/refractory EGPA receiving stable OGCs (prednisolone/prednisone, ≥7.5-50 mg/d) for 4 or more weeks. Patients received 300 mg of subcutaneous mepolizumab or placebo every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Clinical benefit was defined post hoc as follows: remission at any time (2 definitions used), 50% or greater OGC dose reduction during weeks 48 to 52, or no EGPA relapses. The 2 remission definitions were Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score of 0 plus OGC dose of 4 mg/d or less (remission 1/clinical benefit 1) or 7.5 mg/d or less (remission 2/clinical benefit 2). Clinical benefit was assessed in all patients and among subgroups with a baseline blood eosinophil count of less than 150 cells/μL, baseline OGC dosage of greater than 20 mg/d, or weight of greater than 85 kg.

resultsWith mepolizumab versus placebo, 78% versus 32% of patients experienced clinical benefit 1, and 87% versus 53% of patients experienced clinical benefit 2 (both P < .001). Significantly more patients experienced clinical benefit 1 with mepolizumab versus placebo in the blood eosinophil count less than 150 cells/μL subgroup (72% vs 43%, P = .033) and weight greater than 85 kg subgroup (68% vs 23%, P = .005); in the OGC greater than 20 mg/d subgroup, results were not significant but favored mepolizumab (60% vs 36%, P = .395).

conclusionWhen a comprehensive definition of clinical benefit was applied to data from a randomized controlled trial, 78% to 87% of patients with EGPA experienced benefit with mepolizumab.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDouble-Blind MethodEosinophilic GranulomaEosinophilsFemaleGranulomatosis with PolyangiitisHumansInterleukin-5Leukocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedPlacebosPrednisoloneTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedInterleukin-5mepolizumabPlacebosPrednisoloneChurg-Strauss syndromeEosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitiseosinophilsIL-5mepolizumabvasculitis

Identifiers

PMID30578883
PMCPMC7254609
OpenAlexW2905045302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.