GuidelineGastroenterology2019
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diagnosis and Monitoring of Celiac Disease-Changing Utility of Serology and Histologic Measures: Expert Review.
Guideline in Gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
121 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 257 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of celiac disease recommendations for children with Down syndrome.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Effect ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2024Trial
- Constipation with bloating: a clinical approach to evaluation and management.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Linkage between HLA-B8 and HLA-DQ2.5 contributes to ancestry-dependent risk for celiac disease.Journal of human immunity · 2026Article
- Article
- Histologically Confirmed Celiac Disease in a Multifactorial Primary-Care Presentation with Psychiatric, Musculoskeletal, and Hepatic Findings: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- The Frequency of Celiac Disease in Siblings of Celiac Patients and Applicability of Non-Biopsy Diagnostic Criteria.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical and Histopathological Profile of Adults with Celiac Disease at Diagnosis and on a Gluten-Free Diet: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Linkage between HLA-B8 and HLA-DQ2.5 Contributes to Ancestry-Dependent Genetic Risk for Celiac Disease.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Periodontal Status of Patients with Celiac Disease and Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Prevalence and Predictors of Persistent Celiac Disease Antibody Positivity During Follow-Up.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- T cell receptors for antigen on intraepithelial cytolytic T lymphocytes in celiac disease engage enterocyte HLA-E and HLA-B.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Comparable disease course in pediatric celiac disease with or without endoscopic confirmation at high anti-TG2-IgA-antibody titers.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- An integrated nutritional and performance monitoring framework for athletes with celiac disease: A structured narrative review.Current research in food science · 2026Review
- Gluten contamination in commercially available gluten-free products in Jordan: a cross-sectional market surveillance study with public health implications.Journal of nutritional science · 2026Article
- Celiac Disease in Children with Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome-A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Nutrition and Psoriasis: The Latest Evidence and How to Approach Nutrition in Clinical Practice.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- Review
- Diagnosing paediatric coeliac disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Article
61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this clinical practice update is to define key modalities in the diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease (CD) in adults as well as in children and adolescents.
methodsThe recommendations outlined in this expert review are based on available published evidence, including cohort and case-control studies of the diagnostic process as well as controlled and descriptive studies of disease management. Best Practice Advice 1: Serology is a crucial component of the detection and diagnosis of CD, particularly tissue transglutaminase-immunoglobulin A (TG2-IgA), IgA testing, and less frequently, endomysial IgA testing. Best Practice Advice 2: Thorough histological analysis of duodenal biopsies with Marsh classification, counting of lymphocytes per high-power field, and morphometry is important for diagnosis as well as for differential diagnosis. Best Practice Advice 2a: TG2-IgA, at high levels (> ×10 upper normal limit) is a reliable and accurate test for diagnosing active CD. When such a strongly positive TG2-IgA is combined with a positive endomysial antibody in a second blood sample, the positive predictive value for CD is virtually 100%. In adults, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and duodenal biopsies may then be performed for purposes of differential diagnosis. Best Practice Advice 3: IgA deficiency is an infrequent but important explanation for why patients with CD may be negative on IgA isotype testing despite strong suspicion. Measuring total IgA levels, IgG deamidated gliadin antibody tests, and TG2-IgG testing in that circumstance is recommended. Best Practice Advice 4: IgG isotype testing for TG2 antibody is not specific in the absence of IgA deficiency. Best Practice Advice 5: In patients found to have CD first by intestinal biopsies, celiac-specific serology should be undertaken as a confirmatory test before initiation of a gluten-free diet (GFD). Best Practice Advice 6: In patients in whom CD is strongly suspected in the face of negative biopsies, TG2-IgA should still be performed and, if positive, repeat biopsies might be considered either at that time or sometime in the future. Best Practice Advice 7: Reduction or avoidance of gluten before diagnostic testing is discouraged, as it may reduce the sensitivity of both serology and biopsy testing. Best Practice Advice 8: When patients have already started on a GFD before diagnosis, we suggest that the patient go back on a normal diet with 3 slices of wheat bread daily preferably for 1 to 3 months before repeat determination of TG2-IgA. Best Practice Advice 9: Determination of HLA-DQ2/DQ8 has a limited role in the diagnosis of CD. Its value is largely related to its negative predictive value to rule out CD in patients who are seronegative in the face of histologic changes, in patients who did not have serologic confirmation at the time of diagnosis, and in those patients with a historic diagnosis of CD; especially as very young children before the introduction of celiac-specific serology. MANAGEMENT: Best Practice Advice 10: Celiac serology has a guarded role in the detection of continued intestinal injury, in particular as to sensitivity, as negative serology in a treated patient does not guarantee that the intestinal mucosa has healed. Persistently positive serology usually indicates ongoing intestinal damage and gluten exposure. Follow-up serology should be performed 6 and 12 months after diagnosis, and yearly thereafter. Best Practice Advice 11: Patients with persistent or relapsing symptoms, without other obvious explanations for those symptoms, should undergo endoscopic biopsies to determine healing even in the presence of negative TG2-IgA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.