Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30578661›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental ophthalmology2019

Four-year results of a minimally invasive transscleral glaucoma gel stent implantation in a prospective multi-centre study.

Markus Lenzhofer, Inga Kersten-Gomez, Arsham Sheybani, Husayn Gulamhusein, Clemens Strohmaier, Melchior Hohensinn, H Burkhard Dick, Wolfgang Hitzl, Lisa Eisenkopf, Fady Sedarous and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. The efficacy and safety of the XEN63 glaucoma gel stent without Mitomycin C over the first 10 years.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Outcomes of Ab Interno 63 µm vs. 45 µm XENJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Markus LenzhoferDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, University Clinic Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5299-7330
Inga Kersten-GomezDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Eye Clinic Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Arsham SheybaniDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Husayn GulamhuseinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Clemens StrohmaierDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, University Clinic Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Melchior HohensinnDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, University Clinic Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
H Burkhard DickDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Eye Clinic Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Wolfgang HitzlDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, University Clinic Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Lisa EisenkopfDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Eye Clinic Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Fady SedarousDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Iqbal I AhmedDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Herbert A ReitsamerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, University Clinic Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Paracelsus Medical University · ATBochum University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversity of Toronto · CAWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe transscleral XEN Glaucoma Gel Microstent (XEN-GGM, Allergan Plc., Parsippany, New Jersey) is implanted by a minimally invasive ab interno technique.

backgroundThe present study aims to assess the long-term clinical outcomes in patients after XEN-GGM implantation.

designThis prospective, non-randomized, multi-centred study was conducted in three countries (Austria, Canada and Germany).

participantsSixty-four consecutive eyes of 64 patients with open angle glaucoma received the XEN-GGM (63 μm) without Mitomycin C. Thirty-five (55%) were solo procedures, and 29 (45%) were combined with cataract surgery.

methodsVisits were planned at baseline, 6 months, 1, 2, 3 and 4 years postoperatively.

main outcome measuresThe main outcome measures were mean intraocular pressure (IOP), mean number of IOP lowering medication. Secondary outcome parameters were: visual acuity, visual fields and complete surgical failure (defined as presence of a secondary IOP lowering procedure or loss of light perception) at 4 years, postoperatively.

resultsMean best-medicated baseline IOP was 22.5 ± 4.2 mmHg and decreased significantly to 13.4 ± 3.1 mmHg 4 years postoperatively (-40%, n = 34, P < 0.001). Mean number of IOP lowering medication decreased significantly from 2.4 ± 1.3 preoperatively to 1.2 ± 1.3 (-50%, n = 34, P < 0.001) postoperatively. Visual field mean deviation showed no significant change between preoperative and postoperative examinations. Complete surgical failure rate per year was 10%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The XEN-GGM resulted in lower IOP and a reduction in medications from baseline over 4 years of follow-up. There was no detectable decrease in visual fields over the study. The surgical failure rate is comparable to other filtration surgeries.

Indexed as

Glaucoma Drainage ImplantsStentsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCataract ExtractionFemaleGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresProspective StudiesProsthesis Implantationefficacylong-termMIGSsafetyXEN glaucoma gel microstent

Identifiers

PMID30578661
PMCPMC6767491
OpenAlexW2905975551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.