Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30578620›Full record

ArticleProteomics. Clinical applications2019

Quantitative Proteomic Profiling of Cerebrospinal Fluid to Identify Candidate Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease.

Gajanan Sathe, Chan Hyun Na, Santosh Renuse, Anil K Madugundu, Marilyn Albert, Abhay Moghekar, Akhilesh Pandey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteomics. Clinical applications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Longitudinal plasma proteomics: relation to incident Alzheimer's disease dementia and biomarkers.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gajanan SatheCenter for Molecular Medicine, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, 560029, India.
Chan Hyun NaMcKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Santosh RenuseMcKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4051-5637
Anil K MadugunduCenter for Molecular Medicine, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, 560029, India.
Marilyn AlbertDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Abhay MoghekarDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Akhilesh PandeyCenter for Molecular Medicine, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, 560029, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4274-7316

Funding

Project 2 MeasurementU19AG033655 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Arnold Bakker · 2014 to 2026
$51.5M
Understanding Mechanisms of a-synuclein pathologyP50NS038377 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KO, HANSEOK · 1998 to 2019
$38.8M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066507 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Corinne Pettigrew · 2020 to 2026
$29.3M
Fourier Transform Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid Mass Spectrometer with ETDS10OD021844 · OD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PANDEY, AKHILESH · 2016 to 2016
$1.1M
DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/M/15/1/502023NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066507NIA NIH HHS U19 AG033655NIA NIH HHS U19AG03365 (MA)NIH HHS S10 OD021844NIH HHS S10OD021844NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS038377NINDS NIH HHS P50NS38377 (AP)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to identify the potential cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and to evaluate these markers on independent CSF samples using parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) assays. EXPERIMENTAL

designHigh-Resolution mass spectrometry and tandem mass tag (TMT) multiplexing technology are employed to identify potential biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease. Some of the identified potential biomarkers are validated using PRM assays.

resultsA total of 2327 proteins are identified in the CSF of which 139 are observed to be significantly altered in the CSF of AD patients. The proteins altered in AD includes a number of known AD marker such as MAPT, NPTX2, VGF, GFAP, and NCAM1 as well as novel biomarkers such as PKM and YWHAG. These findings are validated in a separate set of CSF specimens from AD dementia patients and controls. NPTX2, in combination with PKM or YWHAG, leads to the best results with AUCs of 0.935 and 0.933, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The proteins that are found to be altered in the CSF of patients with AD could be used for monitoring disease progression and therapeutic response and perhaps also for early detection once they are validated in larger studies.

Indexed as

Proteomics14-3-3 ProteinsAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve Tissue ProteinsPentraxinsPyruvate Kinase14-3-3 ProteinsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinNerve Tissue ProteinsPentraxinsPyruvate KinaseYWHAG protein, humanAlzheimer's diseasebiomarkerbiomedical applicationscerebrospinal fluidmass spectrometryparallel reaction monitoringproteomeTMT

Identifiers

PMID30578620
PMCPMC6639119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.