Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30578451›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychology review2018

Evaluating Spelling in Glioma Patients Undergoing Awake Surgery: a Systematic Review.

Fleur van Ierschot, Roelien Bastiaanse, Gabriele Miceli

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Crossed Pure Agraphia by Graphemic Buffer Impairment following Right Orbito-Frontal Glioma Resection.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Fleur van IerschotInternational Doctorate for Experimental Approaches to Language and Brain (IDEALAB), Universities of Trento, Groningen, Newcastle, Potsdam and Macquarie University, Trento, Italy.
Roelien BastiaanseInternational Doctorate for Experimental Approaches to Language and Brain (IDEALAB), Universities of Trento, Groningen, Newcastle, Potsdam and Macquarie University, Trento, Italy.
Gabriele MiceliInternational Doctorate for Experimental Approaches to Language and Brain (IDEALAB), Universities of Trento, Groningen, Newcastle, Potsdam and Macquarie University, Trento, Italy. gabriele.miceli@unitn.it.ORCID 0000-0002-8835-094X
National Research University Higher School of Economics · RUUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Trento · IT

Funding

European Commission 2014-0685/001-001-EMJD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A main goal of awake surgery is to preserve language in order to facilitate return to work and maintain quality of life. Although spelling has become crucial in daily life, it has received little attention in awake surgery practice. We review assessments of spelling carried out in awake surgery studies, to inspect how current neurofunctional theories of spelling may guide pre-, intra- and post-operative neurosurgical practice. A systematic database search in Embase, Medline, PubMed and Web of Science identified studies reporting on spelling assessment in glioma patients undergoing awake surgery. Twenty-three studies were included, of which only 9 report details on spelling assessments. We evaluate the incidence of dysgraphia in glioma patients, the types of spelling errors as a function of tumor location, and the specificity of spelling sites with respect to other language functions. Post-operative dysgraphia arose in 26.9% of the patients with preserved pre-operative handwriting, and persisted in 45.0% of them at follow-up. Intra-operative stimulation interfered only with handwriting in 37.7% of the patients. A network of frontal, parietal and temporal regions was found to underlie central and peripheral spelling processes. Evidence on spelling performance in patients undergoing awake surgery for gliomas is surprisingly scarce. With the limitations inherent in the small number of observations, results converge with the neurofunctional knowledge accruing from studies of stroke cases. Such knowledge should be exploited in more thorough investigations of spelling skills in glioma patients. Implications for clinical and neuroscientific practice are discussed, as well as possible strategies to overcome current limitations.

Indexed as

HandwritingLanguage TestsAgraphiaBrain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringNeurosurgical ProceduresAwake surgeryGliomaHandwriting assessmentLanguage preservationSpellingSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30578451
OpenAlexW2906052484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.