Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30578334›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2018

Patients' perceptions and patient-reported outcomes in progressive-fibrosing interstitial lung diseases.

Jeffrey J Swigris, Kevin K Brown, Rayid Abdulqawi, Ketan Buch, Daniel F Dilling, Dirk Koschel, Krishna Thavarajah, Rade Tomic, Yoshikazu Inoue

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Health-related quality of life of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jeffrey J SwigrisInterstitial Lung Disease Program, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA.
Kevin K BrownInterstitial Lung Disease Program, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA.
Rayid AbdulqawiManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Ketan BuchDept of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Daniel F DillingDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9723-510X
Dirk KoschelDept of Pulmonary Diseases, Fachkrankenhaus Coswig, Centre for Pulmonary Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, Coswig, Germany.
Krishna ThavarajahDept of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Rade TomicDept of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2394-1287
Yoshikazu InoueClinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of interstitial lung disease (ILD) create a significant burden on patients, unsettling almost every domain of their lives, disrupting their physical and emotional well-being and impairing their quality of life (QoL). Because many ILDs are incurable, and there are limited reliably-effective, life-prolonging treatment options available, the focus of many therapeutic interventions has been on improving or maintaining how patients with ILD feel and function, and by extension, their QoL. Such patient-centred outcomes are best assessed by patients themselves through tools that capture their perceptions, which inherently incorporate their values and judgements. These patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) can be used to assess an array of constructs affected by a disease or the interventions implemented to treat it. Here, we review the impact of ILD that may present with a progressive-fibrosing phenotype on patients' lives and examine how PROs have been used to measure that impact and the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresActivities of Daily LivingCost of IllnessDisease ProgressionHumansLungLung Diseases, InterstitialPatientsPhenotypePulmonary FibrosisQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30578334
PMCPMC9489034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.