ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2018
A Web-Based Knowledge Translation Resource for Families and Service Providers (The "F-Words" in Childhood Disability Knowledge Hub): Developmental and Pilot Evaluation Study.
Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring Health Care Providers, Families and Educators' Perceptions of an Online Self-Paced F-Words for Child Development Foundations Course.Child: care, health and development · 2026Article
- Integrating the ICF and the F-Words Framework to Support Family-Centered Pediatric Care for Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Child health services research with the people who know best: experiences and lessons from CanChild's collaborations with families.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Service provider perspectives on implementing the 'F-words for child development': an innovative approach to children's health and developmental services.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Establishing patient partners' roles on research teams: a scoping review.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Access to health knowledge for health equality: a multi-phase review focused on disability-health.International journal for equity in health · 2024Review
- Designing for Dissemination and Sustainability to Promote Equitable Impacts on Health.Annual review of public health · 2022Review
- Building a culture of engagement at a research centre for childhood disability.Research involvement and engagement · 2021Article
- Information and Empowerment of Families of Children With Cerebral Palsy in Brazil: The Knowledge Translation Role of Nossa Casa Institute.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2021Article
- Canadian Resources for Siblings of Youth With Chronic Health Conditions to Inform and Support With Healthcare Management: A Qualitative Document Analysis.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2021Review
- Using qualitative research perspectives to inform patient engagement in research.Research involvement and engagement · 2018Article
- Childhood disability: can people implement the F-words in low and middle-income countries - and how?Brazilian journal of physical therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe "F-words in Childhood Disability" (Function, Family, Fitness, Fun, Friends, and Future) are an adaptation and an attempt to operationalize the World Health Organization's (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Since the paper was published (November 2011), the "F-words" have attracted global attention (>12,000 downloads, January 2018). Internationally, people have adopted the "F-words" ideas, and many families and service providers have expressed a need for more information, tools, and resources on the "F-words".
objectiveThis paper reports on the development and pilot evaluation of a Web-based knowledge translation (KT) resource, the "F-words" Knowledge Hub that was created to inform people about the "F-words" and to provide action-oriented tools to support the use of the "F-words" in practice.
methodsAn integrated research team of families and researchers at CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research collaborated to develop, implement, and evaluate the Knowledge Hub. A pilot study design was chosen to assess the usability and utility of the Web-based hub before implementing a larger evaluation study. Data were collected using a brief anonymous Web-based survey that included both closed-ended and open-ended questions, with the closed-ended responses being based on a five-point Likert-type scale. We used descriptive statistics and a summary of key themes to report findings.
resultsFrom August to November 2017, the Knowledge Hub received >6,800 unique visitors. In 1 month (November 2017), 87 people completed the survey, of whom 63 completed the full survey and 24 completed 1 or 2 sections. The respondents included 42 clinicians and 30 family members or individuals with a disability. The majority of people visited the Knowledge Hub 1-5 times (n=63) and spent up to 45 minutes exploring (n=61) before providing feedback. Overall, 66 people provided information on the perceived usefulness of the Knowledge Hub, of which 92% (61/66) found the Knowledge Hub user-friendly and stated that they enjoyed exploring the hub, and a majority (n=52) reported that the Knowledge Hub would influence what they did when working with others. From the open-ended responses (n=48), the "F-words" videos (n=21) and the "F-words" tools (n=15) were rated as the best features on the Knowledge Hub.
conclusionsThe "F-words" Knowledge Hub is an evidence-informed Web-based KT resource that was useful for respondents, most of whom were seen as "early adopters" of the "F-words" concepts. Based on the findings, minor changes are to be made to improve the Knowledge Hub before completing a larger evaluation study on the impact at the family, clinician, and organizational levels with a wider group of users. Our hope is that the "F-words" Knowledge Hub will become a go-to resource for knowledge sharing and exchange for families and service providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.