Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30578215›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018

Smartphone-Based Physical Activity Telecoaching in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Mixed-Methods Study on Patient Experiences and Lessons for Implementation.

Matthias Loeckx, Roberto A Rabinovich, Heleen Demeyer, Zafeiris Louvaris, Rebecca Tanner, Noah Rubio, Anja Frei, Corina De Jong, Elena Gimeno-Santos, Fernanda M Rodrigues and 9 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02158065 nacompletednot on this map

A 3-month Multicenter Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Physical Activity Promotion Program on the Experience of Physical Activity in Patients With COPD (Mr PAPP)

TypeinterventionalSponsorKU LeuvenRan2014 to 2015Enrolled370ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsCoaching program
NCT04348344 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Study on the Prevention and Control System of Chronic Airway Diseases

TypeinterventionalSponsorChina-Japan Friendship HospitalRan2020 to 2021Enrolled522ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmspulmonary rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients' Acceptance in E-Health Clinical Trials.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Personalised Health Behaviour Support Programme in Adults With Post-COVID Syndrome: A Randomised, Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Trial
  7. Sustaining training effects through physical activity coaching (STEP): a randomized controlled trial.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Matthias LoeckxDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0397-4973
Roberto A RabinovichELEGI Colt Laboratory, Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8653-0373
Heleen DemeyerDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-0564
Zafeiris LouvarisDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8661-8546
Rebecca TannerNational Institute for Health Research Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield National Health Services Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0243-9047
Noah RubioELEGI Colt Laboratory, Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5962-8650
Anja FreiEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7134-1000
Corina De JongGroningen Research Institute for Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-Primary Care, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9316-2548
Elena Gimeno-SantosISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5149-2015
Fernanda M RodriguesDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2888-5651
Sara C ButteryNational Institute for Health Research Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield National Health Services Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9410-414X
Nicholas S HopkinsonNational Institute for Health Research Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield National Health Services Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3235-0454
Gilbert BüschingEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5410-8031
Alexandra StrassmannEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8297-544X
Ignasi SerraISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7715-509X
Ioannis VogiatzisFaculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3267-2624
Judith Garcia-AymerichISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7097-4586
Michael I PolkeyNational Institute for Health Research Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield National Health Services Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1243-8571
Thierry TroostersDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2767-5027
National Health Service · GBUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ESUniversity of Zurich · CHCentre for Inflammation Research · GBKU Leuven · BENational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESLuxembourg Institute of Health · LUUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelecoaching approaches can enhance physical activity (PA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, their effectiveness is likely to be influenced by intervention-specific characteristics.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the acceptability, actual usage, and feasibility of a complex PA telecoaching intervention from both patient and coach perspectives and link these to the effectiveness of the intervention.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study based on the completers of the intervention group (N=159) included in an (effective) 12-week PA telecoaching intervention. This semiautomated telecoaching intervention consisted of a step counter and a smartphone app. Data from a project-tailored questionnaire (quantitative data) were combined with data from patient interviews and a coach focus group (qualitative data) to investigate patient and coach acceptability, actual usage, and feasibility of the intervention. The degree of actual usage of the smartphone and step counter was also derived from app data. Both actual usage and perception of feasibility were linked to objectively measured change in PA.

resultsThe intervention was well accepted and perceived as feasible by all coaches present in the focus group as well by patients, with 89.3% (142/159) of patients indicating that they enjoyed taking part. Only a minority of patients (8.2%; 13/159) reported that they found it difficult to use the smartphone. Actual usage of the step counter was excellent, with patients wearing it for a median (25th-75th percentiles) of 6.3 (5.8-6.8) days per week, which did not change over time (P=.98). The smartphone interface was used less frequently and actual usage of all daily tasks decreased significantly over time (P<.001). Patients needing more contact time had a smaller increase in PA, with mean (SD) of +193 (SD 2375) steps per day, +907 (SD 2306) steps per day, and +1489 (SD 2310) steps per day in high, medium, and low contact time groups, respectively; P for-trend=.01. The overall actual usage of the different components of the intervention was not associated with change in step count in the total group (P=.63).

conclusionsThe 12-week semiautomated PA telecoaching intervention was well accepted and feasible for patients with COPD and their coaches. The actual usage of the step counter was excellent, whereas actual usage of the smartphone tasks was lower and decreased over time. Patients who required more contact experienced less PA benefits.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02158065; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02158065 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/73bsaudy9).

Indexed as

COPDoutcome and process assessment (health care)patient adherencepatient satisfactionphysical activitysmartphonetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID30578215
PMCPMC6320438
OpenAlexW2896915505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.