Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30578212›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2018

Real Time Influenza Monitoring Using Hospital Big Data in Combination with Machine Learning Methods: Comparison Study.

Canelle Poirier, Audrey Lavenu, Valérie Bertaud, Boris Campillo-Gimenez, Emmanuel Chazard, Marc Cuggia, Guillaume Bouzillé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Artificial Intelligence for Surveillance in Public Health.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Canelle PoirierLaboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6972-2621
Audrey LavenuCentre d'Investigation Clinique de Rennes, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0049-2397
Valérie BertaudLaboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0293-5531
Boris Campillo-GimenezINSERM, U1099, Rennes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2329-5265
Emmanuel ChazardCentre d'Etudes et de Recherche en Informatique Médicale EA2694, Université de Lille, Lille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7841-5925
Marc CuggiaLaboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6943-3937
Guillaume BouzilléLaboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3637-6558

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional surveillance systems produce estimates of influenza-like illness (ILI) incidence rates, but with 1- to 3-week delay. Accurate real-time monitoring systems for influenza outbreaks could be useful for making public health decisions. Several studies have investigated the possibility of using internet users' activity data and different statistical models to predict influenza epidemics in near real time. However, very few studies have investigated hospital big data.

objectiveHere, we compared internet and electronic health records (EHRs) data and different statistical models to identify the best approach (data type and statistical model) for ILI estimates in real time.

methodsWe used Google data for internet data and the clinical data warehouse eHOP, which included all EHRs from Rennes University Hospital (France), for hospital data. We compared 3 statistical models-random forest, elastic net, and support vector machine (SVM).

resultsFor national ILI incidence rate, the best correlation was 0.98 and the mean squared error (MSE) was 866 obtained with hospital data and the SVM model. For the Brittany region, the best correlation was 0.923 and MSE was 2364 obtained with hospital data and the SVM model.

conclusionsWe found that EHR data together with historical epidemiological information (French Sentinelles network) allowed for accurately predicting ILI incidence rates for the entire France as well as for the Brittany region and outperformed the internet data whatever was the statistical model used. Moreover, the performance of the two statistical models, elastic net and SVM, was comparable.

Indexed as

big dataelectronic health recordsinfluenzainfodemiologyinfoveillancemachine learningSentinelles network

Identifiers

PMID30578212
PMCPMC6320394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.