Multimedia Appendix Removal and Editorial Warning Regarding the MMAS Scale (Two-Way Social Media Messaging in Post-Operative Cataract Surgical Patients: A Prospective Interventional Study).

Thuss Sanguansak, Katharine E Morley, Michael G Morley, Kavin Thinkhamrop, Jaruwan Thuanman, Isha Agarwal

Open access · goldAbstract readPublished Erratum

In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

2citing papers in PubMed

0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

Analysis of the application effect of continuous care for patients with viral keratitis.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2023
Article
Corrigendum and Editorial Warning Regarding Use of the MMAS Scale (The Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) Study for a Group Educational Intervention With Telephone and Text Messaging Support to Improve Medication Adherence for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial).JMIR research protocols · 2019
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

Erratum for
Two-Way Social Media Messaging in Postoperative Cataract Surgical Patients: Prospective Interventional Study.2017

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thuss SanguansakDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4737-5574

Katharine E MorleyDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2286-2253

Michael G MorleyHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6373-7008

Kavin ThinkhamropOphthalmic Consultants of Boston, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-2925

Jaruwan ThuanmanOphthalmic Consultants of Boston, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6797-602X

Isha AgarwalData Management and Statistical Analysis Center, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6979-5660

Harvard University · USKhon Kaen University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8330.].

Identifiers

PMID30578176

DOI10.2196/12120

PMCPMC6320430

OpenAlexW2896151747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.