Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30577830›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Acceptability of screening for mental health difficulties in primary schools: a survey of UK parents.

Emma Soneson, Jasmine Childs-Fegredo, Joanna K Anderson, Jan Stochl, Mina Fazel, Tamsin Ford, Ayla Humphrey, Peter B Jones, Emma Howarth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Universal Child Mental Health Screening for Parents: a Systematic Review of the Evidence.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Mood Monitoring in Schools: A Promising Alternative to Single-Time-Point Screening.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The impact of universal mental health screening on stigma in primary schools.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emma SonesonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Herchel Smith Building, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK. es703@medschl.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1666-3012
Jasmine Childs-FegredoNIHR CLAHRC East of England, University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health, Douglas House, 18 Trumpington Road, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK.
Joanna K AndersonNIHR CLAHRC East of England, University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health, Douglas House, 18 Trumpington Road, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK.
Jan StochlDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Herchel Smith Building, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
Mina FazelDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Tamsin FordUniversity of Exeter Medical School, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Ayla HumphreyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Herchel Smith Building, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
Peter B JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Herchel Smith Building, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
Emma HowarthNIHR CLAHRC East of England, University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health, Douglas House, 18 Trumpington Road, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 10/140/02Department of Health 10/3006/07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany children and young people experiencing mental health difficulties (MHD) do not access care, often due to inadequate identification. Schools have a unique potential to improve early identification; however, evidence is limited regarding the acceptability of school-based identification programmes. This study aimed to examine parents' beliefs about the acceptability of school-wide MHD screening in primary schools.

methodsWe collaborated with experts in school-based mental health to develop a questionnaire to measure parental attitudes toward school-wide MHD screening. The questionnaire contained 13 items relating to acceptability; three open-text boxes for comments on harms, benefits, and screening in general; and four questions that captured demographic information. Parents of children attending four primary schools in Cambridgeshire and Norfolk completed the questionnaire. We calculated counts, percentages, and means for each statement, and analysed responses to open-ended questions using content analysis.

resultsTwo hundred ninety parents returned the questionnaire across the four schools (61% response rate). In the 260 questionnaires analysed, a total of 254 parents (98%) believed that it is important to identify MHD early in life, and 251 (97%) believed that schools have an important role in promoting pupils' emotional health. The majority of parents (N = 213; 82%) thought that screening would be helpful, although 34 parents (13%) thought that screening would be harmful. Perceived harms of screening included inaccurate identification, stigmatisation, and low availability of follow-up care. There was no clear consensus regarding how to obtain consent or provide feedback of screening results. There were no significant differences in responses according to ethnicity, gender, age, or school.

conclusionsResults suggest that most parents within the socio-demographic context of our study will accept MHD screening within primary schools, and that school-based screening is viable from the perspective of parents. The comments provided about potential harms as well as suggestions for programme delivery are relevant to inform the development and evaluation of acceptable and sustainable school-based identification models. Implementation and scale-up of such programmes will require further understanding of the perspectives of mental health professionals, school staff, and the general public as well as further evaluation against the established standards for identification programmes.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthSchool Health ServicesAdultChildChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMental DisordersParentsSchoolsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomAcceptabilityFeasibilityHealth checksIdentificationMental healthSchoolsScreening

Identifiers

PMID30577830
PMCPMC6303970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.