Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30577803›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Rapid analysis of metagenomic data using signature-based clustering.

Timothy Chappell, Shlomo Geva, James M Hogan, Flavia Huygens, Irani U Rathnayake, Stephen Rudd, Wayne Kelly, Dimitri Perrin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Timothy ChappellSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.
Shlomo GevaSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.
James M HoganSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.
Flavia HuygensInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia.
Irani U RathnayakeInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia.
Stephen RuddQueensland Facility for Advanced Bioinformatics (QFAB), Level 6 QBP (Bld 80), Chancellor's place, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Wayne KellySchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.
Dimitri PerrinSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia. dimitri.perrin@qut.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSequencing highly-variable 16S regions is a common and often effective approach to the study of microbial communities, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies provide abundant quantities of data for analysis. However, the speed of existing analysis pipelines may limit our ability to work with these quantities of data. Furthermore, the limited coverage of existing 16S databases may hamper our ability to characterise these communities, particularly in the context of complex or poorly studied environments.

resultsIn this article we present the SigClust algorithm, a novel clustering method involving the transformation of sequence reads into binary signatures. When compared to other published methods, SigClust yields superior cluster coherence and separation of metagenomic read data, while operating within substantially reduced timeframes. We demonstrate its utility on published Illumina datasets and on a large collection of labelled wound reads sourced from patients in a wound clinic. The temporal analysis is based on tracking the dominant clusters of wound samples over time. The analysis can identify markers of both healing and non-healing wounds in response to treatment. Prominent clusters are found, corresponding to bacterial species known to be associated with unfavourable healing outcomes, including a number of strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

conclusionsSigClust identifies clusters rapidly and supports an improved understanding of the wound microbiome without reliance on a reference database. The results indicate a promising use for a SigClust-based pipeline in wound analysis and prediction, and a possible novel method for wound management and treatment.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisHumansMetagenomicsMicrobiotaClusteringCommunity analysisMetagenomicsRead signaturesWound healing

Identifiers

PMID30577803
PMCPMC6302383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.