Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30577742›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

High-throughput cancer hypothesis testing with an integrated PhysiCell-EMEWS workflow.

Jonathan Ozik, Nicholson Collier, Justin M Wozniak, Charles Macal, Chase Cockrell, Samuel H Friedman, Ahmadreza Ghaffarizadeh, Randy Heiland, Gary An, Paul Macklin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. SupportingPRIMUS : problems, resources, and issues in mathematics undergraduate studies · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan OzikArgonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA.
Nicholson CollierArgonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA.
Justin M WozniakArgonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA.
Charles MacalArgonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA.
Chase CockrellDept. of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Samuel H FriedmanOpto-Knowledge Systems, Inc., Torrance, CA, USA.
Ahmadreza GhaffarizadehLawrence J. Ellison Center for Transformative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Randy HeilandIntelligent Systems Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Gary AnDept. of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Paul MacklinIntelligent Systems Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. macklinp@iu.edu.
Argonne National Laboratory · USIndiana University Bloomington · USUniversity of Chicago · USOpto-Knowledge Systems (United States) · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

(PQB6)An Integrative Computational and Bioengineered Tissue Model of MetastasisR01CA180149 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI AGUS, DAVID B, ATALA, ANTHONY · 2013 to 2016
$2.3M
Beagle-2S10OD018495 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI FOSTER, IAN · 2014 to 2014
$2.0M
Adaptive Simulation to Enable Anatomic-scale Agent-basedR01GM115839 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI AN, GARY, MACAL, CHARLES MARTIN · 2015 to 2017
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA180149NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115839NIH HHS S10 OD018495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer is a complex, multiscale dynamical system, with interactions between tumor cells and non-cancerous host systems. Therapies act on this combined cancer-host system, sometimes with unexpected results. Systematic investigation of mechanistic computational models can augment traditional laboratory and clinical studies, helping identify the factors driving a treatment's success or failure. However, given the uncertainties regarding the underlying biology, these multiscale computational models can take many potential forms, in addition to encompassing high-dimensional parameter spaces. Therefore, the exploration of these models is computationally challenging. We propose that integrating two existing technologies-one to aid the construction of multiscale agent-based models, the other developed to enhance model exploration and optimization-can provide a computational means for high-throughput hypothesis testing, and eventually, optimization.

resultsIn this paper, we introduce a high throughput computing (HTC) framework that integrates a mechanistic 3-D multicellular simulator (PhysiCell) with an extreme-scale model exploration platform (EMEWS) to investigate high-dimensional parameter spaces. We show early results in applying PhysiCell-EMEWS to 3-D cancer immunotherapy and show insights on therapeutic failure. We describe a generalized PhysiCell-EMEWS workflow for high-throughput cancer hypothesis testing, where hundreds or thousands of mechanistic simulations are compared against data-driven error metrics to perform hypothesis optimization.

conclusionsWhile key notational and computational challenges remain, mechanistic agent-based models and high-throughput model exploration environments can be combined to systematically and rapidly explore key problems in cancer. These high-throughput computational experiments can improve our understanding of the underlying biology, drive future experiments, and ultimately inform clinical practice.

Indexed as

HumansModels, TheoreticalNeoplasmsWorkflowAgent-based modelCancerEMEWSHigh throughput computingHypothesis testingImmunotherapyPhysiCell

Identifiers

PMID30577742
PMCPMC6302449
OpenAlexW2953317739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.