Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30577730›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2018

Alcohol pictorial health warning labels: the impact of self-affirmation and health warning severity.

Carlos Sillero-Rejon, Angela S Attwood, Anna K M Blackwell, José-Angel Ibáñez-Zapata, Marcus R Munafò, Olivia M Maynard

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Alcohol Health Warning Labels: A Rapid Review with Action Recommendations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos Sillero-RejonUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. cs16092@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5502-9247
Angela S AttwoodUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Anna K M BlackwellUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
José-Angel Ibáñez-ZapataDepartment of Marketing and Market Research, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Marcus R MunafòUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Olivia M MaynardUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBUniversidad de Granada · ES

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/7Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/6Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe examined whether enhancing self-affirmation among a population of drinkers, prior to viewing threatening alcohol pictorial health warning labels, would reduce defensive reactions and promote reactions related to behaviour change. We also examined how health warning severity influences these reactions and whether there is an interaction between self-affirmation and severity.

methodsIn this experimental human laboratory study, participants (n = 128) were randomised to a self-affirmation or control group. After the self-affirmation manipulation was administered, we tracked participants' eye movements while they viewed images of six moderately-severe and six highly-severe pictorial health warning labels presented on large beer cans. Self-reported responses to the pictorial health warning labels were then measured, including avoidance, reactance, effectiveness, susceptibility and motivation to drink less. Finally, participants reported their self-efficacy to drink less and their alcohol use.

resultsThere was no clear evidence that enhancing self-affirmation influenced any outcome. In comparison to moderately-severe health warnings, highly-severe health warnings increased avoidance and reactance and were perceived as more effective and increased motivation to drink less.

conclusionsThese findings call into question the validity of the self-affirmation manipulation, which is purported to reduce defensive reactions to threatening warnings. We discuss possible explanations for this null effect, including the impact of participants' low perceived susceptibility to the risks shown on these pictorial health warning labels. Our finding that highly-severe health warnings increase avoidance and reactance but are also perceived as being more effective and more likely to motivate people to drink less will inform future health warning design and have implications for health warning label theory.

Indexed as

Self EfficacyAdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesFemaleHumansMaleMotivationProduct LabelingRisk AssessmentUnited KingdomYoung AdultAlcoholEye-trackingHealth-warningSelf-affirmationSeverity

Identifiers

PMID30577730
PMCPMC6303887
OpenAlexW2906370388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.