Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30577714›Full record

ArticleHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education2019

The Faith, Activity, and Nutrition (FAN) Dissemination and Implementation Study, Phase 1: Implementation Monitoring Methods and Results.

Ruth P Saunders, Sara Wilcox, Danielle E Jake-Schoffman, Deborah Kinnard, Brent Hutto, Melinda Forthofer, Andrew T Kaczynski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ruth P Saunders1 University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0530-1342
Sara Wilcox1 University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Danielle E Jake-Schoffman2 University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-6381-7323
Deborah Kinnard1 University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Brent Hutto1 University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Melinda Forthofer3 University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Andrew T Kaczynski1 University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

Funding

Faith, Activity, and Nutrition: Dissemination in Underserved CommunitiesU48DP005000 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI WILCOX, SARA · 2014 to 2019
$5.9M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005000NCCDPHP CDC HHS UR6 DP000500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faith-based settings offer opportunities for reaching populations at risk for chronic conditions and are optimal settings for dissemination and implementation (D&I) research. Faith, Activity, and Nutrition (FAN) is an evidence-based program designed to promote physical activity (PA) and healthy eating (HE) through church policy, systems, and environmental change. We report implementation fidelity for Phase 1 of the FAN D&I project, a countywide effort. The group randomized study included pre- and postintervention assessments of core PA and HE components. We compared implementation in early intervention ( n = 35) versus delayed intervention (control, n = 19) churches; assessed individual church implementation; and examined the effects of level of implementation on church member outcomes. Implementation assessments were conducted with the FAN coordinator via telephone survey. Study outcomes were assessed with church members 8 to 12 months following baseline assessment via self-administered surveys. We found significantly higher levels of implementation for PA opportunities, PA and HE guidelines, PA and HE messages, and PA and HE pastor support in intervention versus control churches and showed church-level variation in PA and HE implementation. PA self-efficacy varied by level of implementation; high and low implementers did not differ in proportion of church members physically inactive, although low implementers had fewer members inactive than controls. The high level of implementation in intervention churches shows promise for broader dissemination of FAN.

Indexed as

ChristianityHealthy LifestyleReligion and MedicineBlack or African AmericanCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleHealth PromotionHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationSouth CarolinaSurveys and Questionnairesfaith-based settingshealthy eatingimplementation fidelityphysical activityprocess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID30577714
PMCPMC7199798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.