ReviewViruses2018
Review in Viruses, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ecology and evolutionary dynamics of the A-strain maize streak virus and the decade-long strategies targeting streak-resistant maize.Virus research · 2026Review
- Review
- Geminivirus diseases of legumes in India: current status and approaches for management.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025Review
- Major viral diseases in grain legumes: designing disease resistant legumes from plant breeding and OMICS integration.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Pest categorisation of chickpea chlorotic dwarf virus.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- VIGE: virus-induced genome editing for improving abiotic and biotic stress traits in plants.Stress biology · 2022Review
- Identification of New Chickpea Virus and Control of Chickpea Virus Disease.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Review
- Duplex PCR assay for detection of chickpea chlorotic dwarf virus and peanut witches' broom phytoplasma in chickpea.3 Biotech · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chickpea stunt disease (CSD), caused by
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.