Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30577567›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Effectiveness of Screening and Treatment Approaches for Schistosomiasis and Strongyloidiasis in Newly-Arrived Migrants from Endemic Countries in the EU/EEA: A Systematic Review.

Eric N Agbata, Rachael L Morton, Zeno Bisoffi, Emmanuel Bottieau, Christina Greenaway, Beverley-A Biggs, Nadia Montero, Anh Tran, Nick Rowbotham, Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ChronicJournal of medical microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Schistosomiasis in non-endemic areas: Italian consensus recommendations for screening, diagnosis and management by the Italian Society of Tropical Medicine and Global Health (SIMET), endorsed by the Committee for the Study of Parasitology of the Italian Association of Clinical Microbiologists (CoSP-AMCLI), the Italian Society of Parasitology (SoIPa), the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy (SIGE), the Italian Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (SIGO), the Italian Society of Colposcopy and Cervico-Vaginal Pathology (SICPCV), the Italian Society of General Medicine and Primary Care (SIMG), the Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT), the Italian Society of Pediatrics (SIP), the Italian Society of Paediatric Infectious Diseases (SITIP), the Italian Society of Urology (SIU).Infection · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A simple new screening tool for diagnosing imported schistosomiasis.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Eric N AgbataFaculty of Health Science, University of Roehampton London, London SW15 5PU, UK. eric.agbata@roehampton-online.ac.uk.
Rachael L MortonNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW 205, Sydney, Australia. Rachael.morton@ctc.usyd.edu.au.
Zeno BisoffiCentre for Tropical Diseases (CTD), IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Negrar, 37024 Negrar, Verona, Italy. zeno.bisoffi@sacrocuore.it.
Emmanuel BottieauDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, 155 Nationalestraat 2000 Antwerp, Belgium. EBottieau@itg.be.
Christina GreenawayDivision of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Epidemiology, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal QC H3A 0G4, Canada. ca.greenaway@mcgill.ca.
Beverley-A BiggsDepartment of Medicine at the Doherty Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Melbourne, Australia. babiggs@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-2961-9793
Nadia MonteroCentro de Investigación en Salud Pública y Epidemiología Clínica (CISPEC). Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial, Quito 170509, Ecuador. nadiamonteromd@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5375-3781
Anh TranNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW 205, Sydney, Australia. anh.tran@ctc.usyd.edu.au.
Nick RowbothamNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW 205, Sydney, Australia. rowbothamn@gmail.com.
Ingrid Arevalo-RodriguezCentro de Investigación en Salud Pública y Epidemiología Clínica (CISPEC). Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial, Quito 170509, Ecuador. inarev7@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7326-4504
Daniel T MyranBruyere Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa ON K1N 6N5, Canada; daniel.myran@gmail.com13European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Gustav III: s Boulevard 40, 169 73 Solna, Sweden. daniel.myran@gmail.com.
Teymur NooriEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Gustav III: s Boulevard 40, 169 73 Solna, Sweden. Teymur.Noori@ecdc.europa.eu.ORCID 0000-0002-8935-749X
Pablo Alonso-CoelloIberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Kevin PottieCentre for Global Health Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa K1N 6N5, ON, Canada. kpottie@uottawa.ca.
Ana Requena-MéndezISGlobal, Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal-CRESIB, Hospital Clínic-University of Barcelona), E-08036 Barcelona, Spain. ana.requena@isglobal.org.
The University of Sydney · AUUniversidad UTE · ECUniversity of Ottawa · CABarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control · SEIberoamerican Cochrane Centre · ESInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEJewish General Hospital · CAThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the evidence on screening and treatment for two parasitic infections-schistosomiasis and strongyloidiasis-among migrants from endemic countries arriving in the European Union and European Economic Area (EU/EEA). We conducted a systematic search of multiple databases to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between 1 January 1993 and 30 May 2016 presenting evidence on diagnostic and treatment efficacy and cost-effectiveness. We conducted additional systematic search for individual studies published between 2010 and 2017. We assessed the methodological quality of reviews and studies using the AMSTAR, Newcastle⁻Ottawa Scale and QUADAS-II tools. Study synthesis and assessment of the certainty of the evidence was performed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. We included 28 systematic reviews and individual studies in this review. The GRADE certainty of evidence was low for the effectiveness of screening techniques and moderate to high for treatment efficacy. Antibody-detecting serological tests are the most effective screening tests for detection of both schistosomiasis and strongyloidiasis in low-endemicity settings, because they have higher sensitivity than conventional parasitological methods. Short courses of praziquantel and ivermectin were safe and highly effective and cost-effective in treating schistosomiasis and strongyloidiasis, respectively. Economic modelling suggests presumptive single-dose treatment of strongyloidiasis with ivermectin for all migrants is likely cost-effective, but feasibility of this strategy has yet to be demonstrated in clinical studies. The evidence supports screening and treatment for schistosomiasis and strongyloidiasis in migrants from endemic countries, to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

Transients and MigrantsCost-Benefit AnalysisEndemic DiseasesEuropean UnionHumansMass ScreeningSchistosomiasisSerologic TestsStrongyloidiasisGRADEmigrant populationspublic healthschistosomiasis/schistosomascreening/diagnosisstrongyloidiasis/strongyloidestreatment

Identifiers

PMID30577567
PMCPMC6339107
OpenAlexW2905310559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.