Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30577559›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2018

Association of l-Arginine Supplementation with Markers of Endothelial Function in Patients with Cardiovascular or Metabolic Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Josianne Rodrigues-Krause, Mauricio Krause, Ilanna Marques Gomes da Rocha, Daniel Umpierre, Ana Paula Trussardi Fayh

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. A single dose of dietary nitrate supplementation protects against endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury in early postmenopausal women.Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme · 2022
    Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Josianne Rodrigues-KrauseSchool of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Felizardo Strees 750, Porto Alegre 90690-200, RS, Brazil. josi_danca@yahoo.com.br.
Mauricio KrauseLaboratory of Inflammation, Metabolism and Exercise Research (LAPIMEX) and Laboratory of Cellular Physiology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Sarmento Leite Street 750, Porto Alegre 90035-190, RS, Brazil. mauricio.krause@ufrgs.br.
Ilanna Marques Gomes da RochaGraduation Program in Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Senador Salgado Filho Street 3000, Natal 59078-970, RN, Brazil. ilanna.marques@gmail.com.
Daniel UmpierreDepartment of Public Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, São Manuel Street S/N, Porto Alegre 90620-110, RS, Brazil. daniel.umpierre@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6953-0163
Ana Paula Trussardi FayhGraduation Program in Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Senador Salgado Filho Street 3000, Natal 59078-970, RN, Brazil. apfayh@yahoo.com.br.ORCID 0000-0002-9130-9630

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

l-Arginine supplementation is a potential therapy for treating cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. However, the use of distinct l-arginine sources, intervened populations, and treatment regimens may have yielded confusion about their efficacy. This research constitutes a systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing the effects of l-arginine supplementation compared to placebo in individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD), obesity, or diabetes. Eligibility criteria included randomized clinical trials and interventions based on oral supplementation of l-arginine with a minimum duration of three days; comparison groups consisted of individuals with the same disease condition receiving an oral placebo substance. The primary outcome was flow-mediated dilation, and secondary outcomes were nitrite/nitrate (NOx) rate and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA). Statistical heterogeneity among studies included in the meta-analyses was assessed using the inconsistency index (I2). Fifty-four full-text articles from 3761 retrieved references were assessed for eligibility. After exclusions, 13 studies were included for data extraction. There was no difference in blood flow after post-ischemic hyperemia between the supplementation of l-arginine and placebo groups before and after the intervention period (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.30; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = -0.85 to 1.46; I2 = 96%). Sensitivity analysis showed decreased heterogeneity when the studies that most favor arginine and placebo were removed, and positive results in favor of arginine supplementation were found (SMD = 0.59; 95% CIs = 0.10 to 1.08; I2 = 75%). No difference was found in meta-analytical estimates of NOx and ADMA responses between arginine or placebo treatments. Overall, the results indicated that oral l-arginine supplementation was not associated with improvements on selected variables in these patients (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42017077289).

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsEndothelium, VascularAdultAgedArginineCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansHyperemiaMaleMiddle AgedNitratesNitritesObesityTreatment OutcomeArginineNitratesNitritesN,N-dimethylarginineasymmetric dimethylargininecardiovascular diseaseflow-mediated dilationnitric oxideobesitytype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID30577559
PMCPMC6357192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.