Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30577490›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Proteomic Analysis of Mouse Brain Subjected to Spaceflight.

Xiao Wen Mao, Lawrence B Sandberg, Daila S Gridley, E Clifford Herrmann, Guangyu Zhang, Ravi Raghavan, Roman A Zubarev, Bo Zhang, Louis S Stodieck, Virginia L Ferguson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Nutrients · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Omics Studies of Tumor Cells under Microgravity Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Antioxidant Activity of Crocodile Oil (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Spaceflight induces oxidative damage to blood-brain barrier integrity in a mouse model.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Reptiles in Space Missions: Results and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xiao Wen MaoDepartment of Basic Sciences, Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA. xmao@llu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4508-8689
Lawrence B SandbergDepartment of Biochemistry, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA. lsandberg@llu.edu.
Daila S GridleyDepartment of Basic Sciences, Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA. dgridley@llu.edu.
E Clifford HerrmannDepartment of Biochemistry, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA. cherrmann@llu.edu.
Guangyu ZhangDepartment of Biochemistry, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA. guangyuzhang@llu.edu.
Ravi RaghavanDepartment of Pathology and Human Anatomy, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA. rraghavan@llu.edu.
Roman A ZubarevDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Biomedicum, Karolinska Institutet, SE 17177 Stockholm, Sweden. Roman.Zubarev@ki.se.
Bo ZhangDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Biomedicum, Karolinska Institutet, SE 17177 Stockholm, Sweden. Bo.Zhang@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0001-8890-8416
Louis S StodieckBioServe Space Technologies, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303, USA. stodieck@colorado.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9867-5644
Virginia L FergusonBioServe Space Technologies, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303, USA. Virginia.Ferguson@colorado.edu.
Ted A BatemanDepartment of Bioengineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. tbateman@email.unc.edu.
Michael J PecautDepartment of Basic Sciences, Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA. mpecaut@llu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2915-9686

Funding

National Aeronautics and Space Administration NNX10AJ31G
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is evidence that spaceflight poses acute and late risks to the central nervous system. To explore possible mechanisms, the proteomic changes following spaceflight in mouse brain were characterized. Space Shuttle Atlantis (STS-135) was launched from the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) on a 13-day mission. Within 3⁻5 h after landing, brain tissue was collected to evaluate protein expression profiles using quantitative proteomic analysis. Our results showed that there were 26 proteins that were significantly altered after spaceflight in the gray and/or white matter. While there was no overlap between the white and gray matter in terms of individual proteins, there was overlap in terms of function, synaptic plasticity, vesical activity, protein/organelle transport, and metabolism. Our data demonstrate that exposure to the spaceflight environment induces significant changes in protein expression related to neuronal structure and metabolic function. This might lead to a significant impact on brain structural and functional integrity that could affect the outcome of space missions.

Indexed as

ProteomicsSpace FlightWeightlessnessAnimalsBrainFemaleGlycolysisGray MatterIntracellular SpaceMetabolomeMiceMitochondriaOxidative StressSignal TransductionWhite Matterbrainmicrogravityproteomicsspaceflight

Identifiers

PMID30577490
PMCPMC6337482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.