Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30577461›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2018

Virtual Reality Distraction during Endoscopic Urologic Surgery under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jee Youn Moon, Jungho Shin, Jaeyeon Chung, Sang-Hwan Ji, Soohan Ro, Won Ho Kim

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06244654 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Anxiolytic Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Glasses in Upper Extremity Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2024 to 2024Enrolled86ConditionsAnesthesia, Anxiety, Postoperative Pain, Postoperative RecoveryArmsOculus Quest 2 VR virtual reality glasses and wired over-ear headphones, No VR
NCT06962046 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Can the Use of Virtual Reality Improve Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty With Spinal Anaesthesia? - A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBelfast Health and Social Care TrustRan2024 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsTotal Knee ArthroplastyArmsVirtual Reality
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jee Youn MoonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea. snu23802@snu.ac.kr.
Jungho ShinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea. stjan24@gmail.com.
Jaeyeon ChungDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea. jychung1991@snu.ac.kr.
Sang-Hwan JiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea. taepoongshin@gmail.com.
Soohan RoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea. nosuan@gmail.com.
Won Ho KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea. wonhokim@snu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0003-1748-1296
Seoul National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sedation protocols during spinal anesthesia often involve sedative drugs associated with complications. We investigated whether virtual reality (VR) distraction could be applied during endoscopic urologic surgery under spinal anesthesia and yield better satisfaction than pharmacologic sedation. VR distraction without sedative was compared with pharmacologic sedation using repeat doses of midazolam 1⁻2 mg every 30 min during urologic surgery under spinal anesthesia. We compared the satisfaction of patients, surgeons, and anesthesiologists, as rated on a 5-point prespecified verbal rating scale. Two surgeons and two anesthesiologists rated the scale and an overall score was reported after discussion. Thirty-seven patients were randomized to a VR group (

Indexed as

endoscopic urologic surgerysedationspinal anesthesiavirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID30577461
PMCPMC6352098
OpenAlexW2905522192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.