ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2018
Cyanobacterial Septal Junctions: Properties and Regulation.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomes of NBMC genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- Distinct cell division features inJournal of bacteriology · 2025Review
- The role of FraI in cell-cell communication and differentiation in the hormogonia-forming cyanobacteriummSphere · 2024Article
- Article
- Microalgal and Nitrogen-Fixing Bacterial Consortia: From Interaction to Biotechnological Potential.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Comparative Network Biology Discovers Protein Complexes That Underline Cellular Differentiation in Anabaena sp.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2022Article
- Final Destination? PinpointingLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Heterocyst Septa Contain Large Nanopores That Are Influenced by the Fra Proteins in the Filamentous CyanobacteriumJournal of bacteriology · 2021Article
- Extracellular Metabolism Sets the Table for Microbial Cross-Feeding.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2021Review
- Article
- Coexistence of Communicating and Noncommunicating Cells in the Filamentous CyanobacteriummSphere · 2021Article
- Structural Determinants and Their Role in Cyanobacterial Morphogenesis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Loss of Filamentous Multicellularity inJournal of bacteriology · 2020Article
- Current knowledge and recent advances in understanding metabolism of the model cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.Bioscience reports · 2020Review
- Fischerella thermalis: a model organism to study thermophilic diazotrophy, photosynthesis and multicellularity in cyanobacteria.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2019Review
- Article
- Developmental Biology in Cyanobacteria.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Metalloproteins in the Biology of Heterocysts.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Heterocyst-forming cyanobacteria are multicellular organisms that grow as chains of cells (filaments or trichomes) in which the cells exchange regulators and nutrients. In this article, we review the morphological, physiological and genetic data that have led to our current understanding of intercellular communication in these organisms. Intercellular molecular exchange appears to take place by simple diffusion through proteinaceous structures, known as septal junctions, which connect the adjacent cells in the filament and traverse the septal peptidoglycan through perforations known as nanopores. Proteins that are necessary to produce, and that may be components of, the septal junctions-SepJ, FraC and FraD-have been identified in the heterocyst-forming cyanobacterium
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.