Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30576642›Full record

ReviewGastroenterology2019

AGA Technical Review on the Management of Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis.

Siddharth Singh, Joseph D Feuerstein, David G Binion, William J Tremaine

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05938465 (A Phase 1b/2 Study to Demonstrate the Safety and Efficacy of EXE-346 Live Biotherapeutic to Reduce High Bowel Movement Frequency in Subjects With an Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05938465 phase1 / phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Phase 1b/2 Study to Demonstrate the Safety and Efficacy of EXE-346 Live Biotherapeutic to Reduce High Bowel Movement Frequency in Subjects With an Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis (PROF). The "PROF" Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorExegi Pharma, LLCRan2023 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsIleal PouchArmsEXE-346, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Siddharth SinghDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Joseph D FeuersteinDivision of Gastroenterology and Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
David G BinionDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
William J TremaineDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USWinnMed · US

Funding

Comparative Risks and Benefits of Pharmacological Therapies for Older Patients with Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesK23DK117058 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SINGH, SIDDHARTH · 2018 to 2022
$971k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK117058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have mild-to-moderate disease activity, with low risk of colectomy, and are managed by primary care physicians or gastroenterologists. Optimal management of these patients decreases the risk of relapse and proximal disease extension, and may prevent disease progression, complications, and need for immunosuppressive therapy. With several medications (eg, sulfasalazine, diazo-bonded 5-aminosalicylates [ASA], mesalamines, and corticosteroids, including budesonide) and complex dosing formulations, regimens, and routes, to treat a disease with variable anatomic extent, there is considerable practice variability in the management of patients with mild-moderate UC. Hence, the American Gastroenterological Association prioritized clinical guidelines on this topic. To inform clinical guidelines, this technical review was developed in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework for interventional studies. Focused questions included the following: (1) comparative effectiveness and tolerability of different oral 5-ASA therapies (sulfalsalazine vs diazo-bonded 5-ASAs vs mesalamine; low- (<2 g) vs standard (2-3 g/d) vs high-dose (>3 g/d) mesalamine); (2) comparison of different dosing regimens (once-daily vs multiple times per day dosing) and routes (oral vs rectal vs both oral and rectal); (3) role of oral budesonide in patients mild-moderate UC; (4) comparative effectiveness and tolerability of rectal 5-ASA and corticosteroid formulations in patients with distal colitis; and (5) role of alternative therapies like probiotics, curcumin, and fecal microbiota transplantation in the management of mild-moderate UC.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalColitis, UlcerativeDisease ManagementDisease ProgressionFemaleGastroenterologyHumansMaleMesalaminePrognosisRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexSocieties, MedicalSulfasalazineTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalMesalamineSulfasalazine

Identifiers

PMID30576642
PMCPMC6858923
OpenAlexW2905014931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.