Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30576533›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2019

A key role for stimulus-specific updating of the sensory cortices in the learning of stimulus-reward associations.

Berry van den Berg, Benjamin R Geib, Rene San Martín, Marty G Woldorff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Berry van den BergCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Benjamin R GeibCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Rene San MartínCentro de Neuroeconomia, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile.
Marty G WoldorffCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.

Funding

Attentional Mechanisms in Multisensory EnvironmentsR01NS051048 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WOLDORFF, MARTY G. · 2006 to 2016
$3.5M
The Modulatory Role of Reward on Attentional Brain ProcessesR56NS051048 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WOLDORFF, MARTY G. · 2017 to 2017
$398k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS051048NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS051048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful adaptive behavior requires the learning of associations between stimulus-specific choices and rewarding outcomes. Most research on the mechanisms underlying such processes has focused on subcortical reward-processing regions, in conjunction with frontal circuits. Given the extensive stimulus-specific coding in the sensory cortices, we hypothesized they would play a key role in the learning of stimulus-specific reward associations. We recorded electrical brain activity (using electroencephalogram) during a learning-based decision-making gambling task where, on each trial, participants chose between a face and a house and then received feedback (gain or loss). Within each 20-trial set, either faces or houses were more likely to predict a gain. Results showed that early feedback processing (~200-1200 ms) was independent of the choice made. In contrast, later feedback processing (~1400-1800 ms) was stimulus-specific, reflected by decreased alpha power (reflecting increased cortical activity) over face-selective regions, for winning-vs-losing after a face choice but not after a house choice. Finally, as the reward association was learned in a set, there was an increasingly stronger attentional bias towards the more likely winning stimulus, reflected by increasing attentional orienting-related brain activity and increasing likelihood of choosing that stimulus. These results delineate the processes underlying the updating of stimulus-reward associations during feedback-guided learning, which then guide future attentional allocation and decision-making.

Indexed as

RewardAdultAttentionDecision MakingElectroencephalographyFeedbackFemaleGamblingHumansLearningMaleSomatosensory CortexYoung Adultdecision-makingEEGFRNoscillatory alphaP3reward learning

Identifiers

PMID30576533
PMCPMC6374612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.