Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30576489›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2018

iTextMine: integrated text-mining system for large-scale knowledge extraction from the literature.

Jia Ren, Gang Li, Karen Ross, Cecilia Arighi, Peter McGarvey, Shruti Rao, Julie Cowart, Subha Madhavan, K Vijay-Shanker, Cathy H Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Automated extraction of genes associated with antibiotic resistance from the biomedical literature.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. emiRIT: a text-mining-based resource for microRNA information.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021
    Article
  12. Recent advances in biomedical literature mining.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jia RenCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Gang LiDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Karen RossProtein Information Resource, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Cecilia ArighiCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Peter McGarveyProtein Information Resource, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Shruti RaoInnovation Center For Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Julie CowartCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Subha MadhavanInnovation Center For Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
K Vijay-ShankerDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Cathy H WuCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.

Funding

MACE2K - Molecular And Clinical Extraction: A Natural Language Processing Tool for Personalized MedicineU01HG008390 · NHGRI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MADHAVAN, SUBHA · 2015 to 2017
$1.5M
Semantic Literature Annotation and Integrative Panomics Analysis for PTM-Disease Knowledge Network DiscoveryU01GM120953 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI SHANKER, VIJAY K, WU, CATHY H. · 2016 to 2018
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008390NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM120953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous efforts have been made for developing text-mining tools to extract information from biomedical text automatically. They have assisted in many biological tasks, such as database curation and hypothesis generation. Text-mining tools are usually different from each other in terms of programming language, system dependency and input/output format. There are few previous works that concern the integration of different text-mining tools and their results from large-scale text processing. In this paper, we describe the iTextMine system with an automated workflow to run multiple text-mining tools on large-scale text for knowledge extraction. We employ parallel processing with dockerized text-mining tools with a standardized JSON output format and implement a text alignment algorithm to solve the text discrepancy for result integration. iTextMine presently integrates four relation extraction tools, which have been used to process all the Medline abstracts and PMC open access full-length articles. The website allows users to browse the text evidence and view integrated results for knowledge discovery through a network view. We demonstrate the utilities of iTextMine with two use cases involving the gene PTEN and breast cancer and the gene SATB1.

Indexed as

PublicationsSoftwareAbstracting and IndexingAlgorithmsData Mining

Identifiers

PMID30576489
PMCPMC6301332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.