Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30576379›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Effects of RNA structure and salt concentration on the affinity and kinetics of interactions between pentatricopeptide repeat proteins and their RNA ligands.

James J McDermott, Bryce Civic, Alice Barkan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Plant organellar RNA maturation.The Plant cell · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Analysis of the Editing Defects in thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Approaches for measuring the dynamics of RNA-protein interactions.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James J McDermottInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Bryce CivicInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Alice BarkanInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3049-2838
University of Oregon · US

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICST32GM007759 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI NOLEN, BRADLEY J · 1985 to 2021
$8.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are helical repeat proteins that bind specific RNA sequences via modular 1-repeat:1-nucleotide interactions. Binding specificity is dictated, in part, by hydrogen bonds between the amino acids at two positions in each PPR motif and the Watson-Crick face of the aligned nucleobase. There is evidence that PPR-RNA interactions can compete with RNA-RNA interactions in vivo, and that this competition underlies some effects of PPR proteins on gene expression. Conversely, RNA secondary structure can inhibit the binding of a PPR protein to its specific binding site. The parameters that influence whether PPR-RNA or RNA-RNA interactions prevail are unknown. Understanding these parameters will be important for understanding the functions of natural PPR proteins and for the design of engineered PPR proteins for synthetic biology purposes. We addressed this question by analyzing the effects of RNA structures of varying stability and position on the binding of the model protein PPR10 to its atpH RNA ligand. Our results show that even very weak RNA structures (ΔG° ~ 0 kcal/mol) involving only one nucleotide at either end of the minimal binding site impede PPR10 binding. Analysis of binding kinetics using Surface Plasmon Resonance showed that RNA structures reduce PPR10's on-rate and increase its off-rate. Complexes between the PPR proteins PPR10 and HCF152 and their respective RNA ligands have long half-lives (one hour or more), correlating with their functions as barriers to exonucleolytic RNA decay in vivo. The effects of salt concentration on PPR10-RNA binding kinetics showed that electrostatic interactions play an important role in establishing PPR10-RNA interactions but play a relatively small role in maintaining specific interactions once established.

Indexed as

KineticsLigandsPoly(A)-Binding ProteinsProtein BindingRNALigandsPoly(A)-Binding ProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID30576379
PMCPMC6303017
OpenAlexW2905678533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.