Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30576330›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

Local care and treatment of liver disease (LOCATE) - A cluster-randomized feasibility study to discover, assess and manage early liver disease in primary care.

Magdy El-Gohary, Mike Moore, Paul Roderick, Emily Watkins, Joanne Dash, Tina Reinson, Colin Newell, Miranda Kim, Beth Stuart, Taeko Becque and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Diabetes and obesity reduce FIB-4 accuracy in MASLD referral pathways.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Limitations of non-invasive tests for assessment of liver fibrosis.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2020
    Review
  16. Alcohol care teams: where are we now?Frontline gastroenterology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Magdy El-GoharyPrimary Care and Population Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8660-4355
Mike MoorePrimary Care and Population Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5127-4509
Paul RoderickPrimary Care and Population Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Emily WatkinsNational Institute for Health Research, Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Joanne DashNational Institute for Health Research, Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Tina ReinsonNational Institute for Health Research, Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Colin NewellPrimary Care and Population Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1933-3262
Miranda KimNational Institute for Health Research, Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Beth StuartPrimary Care and Population Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Taeko BecquePrimary Care and Population Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0362-3794
Nick SheronNational Institute for Health Research, Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
University of Southampton · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-IPF-2013-07-08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic liver disease is an escalating problem both in the United Kingdom and worldwide. In the UK mortality rates have risen sharply over the previous 50 years predominantly due to alcohol, however the increasing prevalence of non-alcohol related fatty liver disease both in the UK and elsewhere is also of concern. Liver disease develops silently hence early detection of fibrosis is essential to prevent progression. Primary care presents an opportunity to identify at risk populations, however assessment largely comprises of indirect markers of fibrosis which have little prognostic value. We hypothesised that setting up nurse-led primary care based liver clinics using additional non-invasive testing would increase the number of new diagnoses of liver disease compared to usual care.

methodsThis was a prospective, cluster randomised feasibility trial based in urban primary care in Southampton, United Kingdom. 10 GP practices were randomised to either intervention (liver health nurse) or control (care as usual). Pre recruitment audits were carried out in each practice to ascertain baseline prevalence of liver disease. Participants were subsequently recruited in intervention practices from July 2014-March 2016 via one of 3 pathways: GP referral, nurse led case finding based on risk factors or random AUDIT questionnaire mailouts. Liver assessment included the Southampton Traffic Light test (serum fibrosis markers HA and P3NP) and transient elastography (FibroScan). Cases were ascribed as 'no fibrosis', 'liver warning', 'progressive fibrosis' or 'probable cirrhosis'. Post recruitment audits were repeated and incident liver diagnoses captured from July 2014-September 2016. Each new diagnosis was reviewed in a virtual clinic by a consultant hepatologist.

findings910 participants were seen in the nurse led clinic-44 (4.8%) probable cirrhosis, 141 (15.5%) progressive fibrosis, 220 (24.2%) liver warning and 505 (55.5%) no evidence of liver fibrosis. 450 (49.5%) cases were due to NAFLD with 356 (39.1%) from alcohol. In the 405 with a liver disease diagnosis, 136 (33.6%) were referred by GP, 218 (53.8%) from nurse led case finding and 51 (12.6%) from the AUDIT mailout. 544 incident cases were identified in the intervention arm compared to 221 in the control arm in the period July 2014-September 2016 (adjusted odds ratio 2.4, 95% CI 2.1 to 2.8).

conclusionsThe incorporation of a liver health nurse into GP practices was simple to arrange and yielded a much higher number of new diagnoses of liver disease compared to usual care. Nearly half of all participants recruited had a degree of liver disease. Nurse led case finding and GP referrals were most effective compared to AUDIT questionnaire mailouts in an urban population in identifying unknown disease. Utilising study and previous data allowed quick and effective virtual review by a hepatologist. Identifying those who are at risk of liver disease from harmful alcohol use remains a challenge and needs to be addressed in future work.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseasePractice Patterns, Nurses'Primary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID30576330
PMCPMC6303066
OpenAlexW2905764934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.