Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30575771›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Hidden mycota of pine needles: Molecular signatures from PCR-DGGE and Ribosomal DNA phylogenetic characterization of novel phylotypes.

Rajesh Jeewon, Quin S Y Yeung, Dhanushka N Wannasinghe, Sillma Rampadarath, Daneshwar Puchooa, Hong-Kai Wang, Kevin D Hyde

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Rajesh JeewonDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Mauritius, Reduit, Mauritius. r.jeewon@uom.ac.mu.
Quin S Y YeungSchool of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Dhanushka N WannasingheCenter of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand.
Sillma RampadarathFaculty of Agriculture, University of Mauritius, Réduit, Mauritius.
Daneshwar PuchooaFaculty of Agriculture, University of Mauritius, Réduit, Mauritius.
Hong-Kai WangBiotechnology Institute, Zhejiang University, 310029, Zhejiang, P. R. China.
Kevin D HydeCenter of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand.
University of Mauritius · MUKunming Institute of Botany · CNMae Fah Luang University · THUniversity of Hong Kong · HKZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies for enumerating fungal communities on pine needles relied entirely on phenotypic diversity (microscopy) or identification based on DNA sequence data from those taxa recovered via cultural studies. To bypass limitations of the culturing methods and provide a more realistic diversity estimate, we employed and assessed a PCR-DGGE based method coupled with rDNA phylogenetic sequence analyses to characterize fungal taxa associated with pine needles. Fresh (living) and decayed needles from three hosts of the Pinaceae (Keteleeria fortunei, Pinus elliottii and P. massoniana) were examined. Morphological studies reveal that the most abundant species associated with decayed needles were Cladosporium cladosporioides and an unidentified Trichoderma species followed by Gliocephalotrichum sp., Gliocladium sp., Lophodermium pinastri, Paecilomyces varioti, Phaeostalagmus cyclosporus and a Phoma sp, which are commonly occurring fungi. Community genomic data from freshly collected and decayed pine needles recovered 40 operational taxonomic units, which appear to be mostly undetected members of the natural fungal consortium. Sequence analyses revealed a number of phylotypes or "species" that were not recovered using traditional morphological and cultural approaches previously used. Phylogenetic data from partial 18S rDNA sequence data reveal that most phylotypes represent potential novel phylogenetic fungal lineages with affinities to the Dothideomycetes, Leotiomycetes, Lecanoromycetes and Sordariomycetes and were not identical to previously known endophytes or saprobes. Although the major ecological roles of these phylotypes in pine needles are still enigmatic, this study provides new insights in hidden fungal diversity that mycologists are possibly ignoring given the discrepancies associated with available methods. To what extent do previously recovered identified species (either as saprobes or endophytes) from morphological or culturing studies act as pioneer decomposers or constitute an integral part of endophytic community warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAscomycotaDNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalEndophytesFungiHost Microbial InteractionsPhylogenyPinusPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNADNA, FungalDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID30575771
PMCPMC6303302
OpenAlexW2905105624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.