Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30574805›Full record

Trial reportCell transplantation2019

Transplantation of Human Neural Progenitor Cells (NPC) into Putamina of Parkinsonian Patients: A Case Series Study, Safety and Efficacy Four Years after Surgery.

I Madrazo, O Kopyov, M A Ávila-Rodríguez, F Ostrosky, H Carrasco, A Kopyov, A Avendaño-Estrada, F Jiménez, E Magallón, C Zamorano and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cell transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Therapeutic role of neural stem cells in neurological diseases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

I Madrazo1 Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Mexico City, Mexico.
O Kopyov2 Celavie Biosciences LLC, Oxnard, CA, USA.
M A Ávila-Rodríguez3 Unidad Radiofarmacia-Ciclotron, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
F Ostrosky4 Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
H Carrasco5 Hospital Central Militar, Mexico City, Mexico.
A Kopyov2 Celavie Biosciences LLC, Oxnard, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0420-138X
A Avendaño-Estrada3 Unidad Radiofarmacia-Ciclotron, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
F Jiménez6 Hospital Angeles Pedregal, Mexico City, Mexico.
E Magallón6 Hospital Angeles Pedregal, Mexico City, Mexico.
C Zamorano6 Hospital Angeles Pedregal, Mexico City, Mexico.
G González4 Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
T Valenzuela6 Hospital Angeles Pedregal, Mexico City, Mexico.
R Carrillo6 Hospital Angeles Pedregal, Mexico City, Mexico.
F Palma6 Hospital Angeles Pedregal, Mexico City, Mexico.
R Rivera6 Hospital Angeles Pedregal, Mexico City, Mexico.
R E Franco-Bourland8 Department of Biochemistry, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico.
G Guízar-Sahagún9 Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.
Hospital Angeles Pedregal · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXCelavie Biosciences (United States) · USHospital Central Militar · MXHospital General de México · MXInstituto Nacional de Rehabilitación · MXMexican Social Security Institute · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) suffer from motor and mental disturbances due to degeneration of dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic neuronal systems. Although they provide temporary symptom relief, current treatments fail to control motor and non-motor alterations or to arrest disease progression. Aiming to explore safety and possible motor and neuropsychological benefits of a novel strategy to improve the PD condition, a case series study was designed for brain grafting of human neural progenitor cells (NPCs) to a group of eight patients with moderate PD. A NPC line, expressing Oct-4 and Sox-2, was manufactured and characterized. Using stereotactic surgery, NPC suspensions were bilaterally injected into patients' dorsal putamina. Cyclosporine A was given for 10 days prior to surgery and continued for 1 month thereafter. Neurological, neuropsychological, and brain imaging evaluations were performed pre-operatively, 1, 2, and 4 years post-surgery. Seven of eight patients have completed 4-year follow-up. The procedure proved to be safe, with no immune responses against the transplant, and no adverse effects. One year after cell grafting, all but one of the seven patients completing the study showed various degrees of motor improvement, and five of them showed better response to medication. PET imaging showed a trend toward enhanced midbrain dopaminergic activity. By their 4-year evaluation, improvements somewhat decreased but remained better than at baseline. Neuropsychological changes were minor, if at all. The intervention appears to be safe. At 4 years post-transplantation we report that undifferentiated NPCs can be delivered safely by stereotaxis to both putamina of patients with PD without causing adverse effects. In 6/7 patients in OFF condition improvement in UPDRS III was observed. PET functional scans suggest enhanced putaminal dopaminergic neurotransmission that could correlate with improved motor function, and better response to L-DOPA. Patients' neuropsychological scores were unaffected by grafting. Trial Registration: Fetal derived stem cells for Parkinson's disease https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN39104513Reg#ISRCTN39104513.

Indexed as

MesencephalonNeural Stem CellsParkinson DiseasePutamenAdolescentAdultAgedAllograftsDopamineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedDopaminehuman neural progenitor cellsParkinson’s diseasePET molecular imagingstem cell transplantationstereotactic surgery

Identifiers

PMID30574805
PMCPMC6425108
OpenAlexW2905941173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.