Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30574438›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2018

Presentation and Outcomes After Medical and Surgical Treatment Versus Medical Treatment Alone of Spontaneous Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Davis G Taylor, Avery L Buchholz, Durga R Sure, Thomas J Buell, James H Nguyen, Ching-Jen Chen, Joshua M Diamond, Perry A Washburn, James Harrop, Christopher I Shaffrey and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Spinal infection with intraspinal abscess or empyema and acute myelopathy: comparative analysis of diagnostics, therapy, complications and outcome in primary care.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Incidence, risk factors and clinical course of pyogenic spondylodiscitis patients with pulmonary embolism.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Davis G TaylorUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Avery L BuchholzMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Durga R SureSt. Mary's Hospital, Essential Health Duluth Clinic, Duluth, MN, USA.
Thomas J BuellUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
James H NguyenUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Ching-Jen ChenUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Joshua M DiamondUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Perry A WashburnUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
James HarropThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christopher I ShaffreyUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Justin S SmithUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
University of Virginia · USDuluth Clinic · USMedical University of South Carolina · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designSystematic literature review.

objectivesThe aims of this study were to (1) describe the clinical features, disabilities, and incidence of neurologic deficits of pyogenic spondylodiscitis prior to treatment and (2) compare the functional outcomes between patients who underwent medical treatment alone or in combination with surgery for pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

methodsA systematic literature review was performed using PubMed according to PRISMA guidelines. No year restriction was put in place. Statistical analysis of pooled data, when documented in the original report (ie, number of patients with desired variable and number of patients evaluated), was conducted to determine the most common presenting symptoms, incidence of pre- and postoperative neurologic deficits, associated comorbidities, infectious pathogens, approach for surgery when performed, and duration of hospitalization. Outcomes data, including return to work status, resolution of back pain, and functional recovery were also pooled among all studies and surgery-specific studies alone. Meta-analysis of studies with subgroup analysis of pain-free outcome in surgical and medical patients was performed.

resultsFifty of 1286 studies were included, comprising 4173 patients undergoing either medical treatment alone or in combination with surgery. Back pain was the most common presenting symptom, reported in 91% of patients. Neurologic deficit was noted in 31% of patients.

conclusionMedical management remains first-line treatment of infectious pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Surgery may be indicated for progressive pain, persistent infection on imaging, deformity or neurologic deficits. If surgery is required, reported literature shows potential for significant pain reduction, improved neurologic function and a high number of patients returning to a normal functional/work status.

Indexed as

back paindiscitisosteodiscitisoutcomepyogenicspondylodiscitis

Identifiers

PMID30574438
PMCPMC6295820
OpenAlexW2905436670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.