Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30574344›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2018

Validation of the Diet Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure of satisfaction with diets for weight management.

B L James, E Loken, L S Roe, K Myrissa, C L Lawton, L Dye, B J Rolls

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07438028 (Interactive Effects of Umami Taste Intensity and Energy Density on Longer Term Food Intake), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07438028 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Interactive Effects of Umami Taste Intensity and Energy Density on Longer Term Food Intake

TypeinterventionalSponsorWageningen UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsSensory Testing, Umami Taste, Energy Density, Food Intake MeasurementArmsRegular energy density, no added umami, Regular energy density, with added umami, Lowered energy density, with added umami
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

B L JamesDepartment of Nutritional Sciences The Pennsylvania State University, University Park PA USA.
E LokenDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies The Pennsylvania State University, University Park PA USA.
L S RoeDepartment of Nutritional Sciences The Pennsylvania State University, University Park PA USA.
K MyrissaHuman Appetite Research Unit (Nutrition and Behaviour Research Group), School of Psychology University of Leeds Leeds UK.
C L LawtonHuman Appetite Research Unit (Nutrition and Behaviour Research Group), School of Psychology University of Leeds Leeds UK.
L DyeHuman Appetite Research Unit (Nutrition and Behaviour Research Group), School of Psychology University of Leeds Leeds UK.
B J RollsDepartment of Nutritional Sciences The Pennsylvania State University, University Park PA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2374-1517

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Diet Satisfaction Questionnaire was developed to fill the need for a validated measure to evaluate satisfaction with weight-management diets. This paper further develops the questionnaire, examining the factor structure of the original questionnaire, cross-validating a revised version in a second sample and relating diet satisfaction to weight loss during a 1-year trial.

methodsThe 45-item Diet Satisfaction Questionnaire (DSat-45) uses seven scales to assess characteristics that influence diet satisfaction: Healthy Lifestyle, Convenience, Cost, Family Dynamics, Preoccupation with Food, Negative Aspects, and Planning and Preparation. It was administered five times during a 1-year weight-loss trial (

resultsInternal consistency (reliability) was moderate for the DSat-45. Confirmatory factor analysis showed improved fit for a five-factor structure, resulting in the DSat-28 that retained four of the original scales and a shortened fifth scale. This revised questionnaire was reliable in both samples. Weight loss across the year-long trial was positively related to satisfaction with Healthy Lifestyle, Preoccupation with Food, and Planning and Preparation in both versions of the questionnaire.

conclusionsMeasures of reliability and validity were improved in the more concise DSat-28 compared to the DSat-45. This shorter measure should be used in future work to evaluate satisfaction with weight-management diets.

Indexed as

Adultsdietobesity treatmentweight loss

Identifiers

PMID30574344
PMCPMC6298208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.