ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2018
Colorectal polyps located across a fold are difficult to resect completely using endoscopic mucosal resection: A propensity score analysis.
Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and validation of a predictive model for pathological upgrading in colorectal polyps based on endoscopic forceps biopsy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- A novel nomogram for the prediction of perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024Article
- EMR+: A Novel Bimanual Endoscopic Technique for En Bloc Resection of a Proximal Colon LSL-NG/PD Lesion Using a New External Additional Working Channel Device.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Complete Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Neoplasia Using a Stepwise Endoscopic Protocol with SOUTEN, a Novel Multifunctional Snare.Clinical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Article
- Conventional versus hybrid knife endoscopic submucosal dissection in large colorectal laterally spreading tumors: A propensity score analysis.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationArticle
- The quality of colorectal polypectomy. Is it enough to have just a visual assessment of the site?Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncomplete polyp resection during colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) might contribute to the development of interval cancer.
objectiveThis retrospective study aimed to determine the incidence of incomplete polyp resection during EMR of colorectal polyps located across a fold compared with that of colorectal polyps located between folds.
methodsIn total, 262 patients with 262 lesions that were ≥10 mm in diameter and treated with conventional EMR were enrolled. The main outcome was the incidence of incomplete polyp resections. Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to reduce the effects of selection bias.
resultsFifty-seven lesions (21.8%) were incompletely resected. After propensity score matching, the lesions located across a fold were at higher risk of incomplete resection than those between folds (26/68, 38.2% vs 7/68, 10.3%; odds ratio (OR): 3.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.61-8.56;
conclusionsThere is an increased risk of an incomplete polyp resection for a colorectal polyp that is located across a fold compared with that for a polyp that is located between folds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.