ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018
Measuring Athletic Mental Energy (AME): Instrument Development and Validation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mental energy and psychological flow in sport: a perspective beyond physical preparation.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- The role of psychological factors and food in improving athletic performance: an analytical study of a specific sports organization's society.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Exploring the determinants of wellbeing in university athletes: roles of athletic identity, mental energy, and social support.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Evaluating athletic mental energy analysis: a novel approach using fuzzy-based Bayesian networks.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Structural relationships among physical literacy, mental toughness, athletic mental energy, achievement emotions, and COVID-19-induced negative psychological states in Chinese adolescents.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The role of athletic mental energy in the occurrence of flow state in male football (soccer) players.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Article
- Validation of the athletic mental energy scale for Chinese school-age adolescents.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The role of the six factors model of athletic mental energy in mediating athletes' well-being in competitive sports.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Chronotype characteristics of professional athletes in China: a comprehensive descriptive study.Journal of physiological anthropology · 2023Article
- Article
- Pre-competition mental energy and performance relationships among physically disabled table tennis players.PeerJ · 2022Article
- Seeking Positive Strengths in Buffering Athletes' Life Stress-Burnout Relationship: The Moderating Roles of Athletic Mental Energy.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although considerable research indicates that mental energy is an important factor in many domains, including athletic performance (Cook and Davis, 2006), athletic mental energy (AME) has never been conceptualized and measured. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conceptualize and develop a reliable and valid instrument to assess AME. In Study 1, a focus group interview established the initial framework of AME. Study 2 used a survey to collect athletes' experiences of AME and develop a scale draft titled "Athletic Mental Energy Scale (AMES)." In Study 3, we examined the psychometric properties and the underlying structure of AMES via item analysis, internal consistency, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). In Study 4, we used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine AMES's factorial validity; and examined concurrent and discriminant validity by examining correlations with athletes' life stress, positive state of mind, and burnout. In study 5, we examined the measurement invariance of the 6-factor, 18-item AMES with Taiwanese and Malaysian samples. Study 6 examined the predictive validity by comparing AMES scores of successful and unsuccessful martial artists. Across these phases, results showed a 6-factor, 18-item AMES had adequate content validity, factorial structure, nomological validity, discriminant validity, predictive validity, measurement invariance, and reliability. We suggest future studies may use AMES to examine its relationships with athletes' cognition, affect, and performance. The application of AMES in sport psychology was also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.