Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30573965›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse : research and treatment2018

The Implications of Cannabis Policy Changes in Washington on Adolescent Perception of Risk, Norms, Attitudes, and Substance Use.

Claire E Blevins, Eliza Marsh, Kelsey E Banes, Robert S Stephens, Denise D Walker, Roger A Roffman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse : research and treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Changes in cannabis use post decriminalisation in mental health care users in South Africa.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Perceptual Styles and Cannabis Consumption Prediction in Young People.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Claire E BlevinsAlpert Medical School, Brown University and Butler Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7159-8842
Eliza MarshBehavioral Medicine and Addictions Research Lab, Butler Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Kelsey E BanesDepartment of Psychology, Palo Alto VA Medical Center, USA.
Robert S StephensDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Denise D WalkerInnovative Programs Research Group, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Roger A RoffmanInnovative Programs Research Group, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USBrown University · USProvidence College · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115677 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI TUULI, METHODIUS GAMUO · 2016 to 2025
$45.0M
REACHING AND MOTIVATING CHANGE IN TEEN MARIJUANA SMOKERSR01DA014296 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEPHENS, ROBERT S, WALKER, DENISE D · 2001 to 2014
$5.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014296NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the effect of legalization (particularly recreational legalization) of cannabis on prevalence of use and related problems. However, there is no consensus about the impact of policy change on cannabis use, particularly among adolescents. Legalization may increase adolescent use through mediating factors such as perceived risk and normative beliefs regarding the use of cannabis. Washington State enacted Initiative 502 on December 2012, which legalized and taxed recreational cannabis for adults aged ⩾21 years. This paper used data from a randomized, controlled intervention trial for cannabis-using adolescents that was recruiting participants in Seattle before and after the policy change to evaluate the following goals: assess differences in substance use, problems, and symptomatology pre- and post-policy change; evaluate several proposed risk factors that may be associated with such differences; and describe participants' understanding of the law and how this understanding may relate to rates of use. Analyses revealed no significant differences pre- to post-policy in rate of substance use. However, there were significant post-policy increases in problems and use disorder symptoms. Despite these differences, there were no significant increases in norms, attitudes, or perceptions of risk. Participants were able to answer most questions regarding policy changes correctly, indicating a good understanding of the policy. Results provided no evidence that policy change influenced heavy-using adolescents' rates of use nor the proposed risk factors associated with problematic use patterns.

Indexed as

adolescentscannabislegalizationmarijuana

Identifiers

PMID30573965
PMCPMC6295677
OpenAlexW2903738272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.