Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30573860›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2018

Early childhood caries and candida albicans.

Duangporn Duangthip, Duangthip D

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05761197 (Association Between Early Candida Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05761197 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Association Between Early Candida Infection (Oral Thrush) and Severe Early Childhood Caries (S-ECC)

TypeobservationalSponsorTemple UniversityRan2024 to 2028Enrolled70ConditionsCandida Infection, Oral Thrush, Early Childhood Caries
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. International journal of microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Duangporn Duangthip
Duangthip D *Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data sourcesSeven electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, LILACS and ClinicalTrials.gov and grey literature were searched. There was no information regarding the restriction of language or publication date.Study selectionFour reviewers included both epidemiological and experimental clinical studies that investigated the presence of oral C. albicans in children (age < 6 years), with or without ECC. Studies including children with severe systematic diseases were excluded.Data extraction and synthesisData were abstracted independently by four reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Meta-analysis was performed. The overall odds ratio of associations between the presence of C. albicans and ECC was calculated. Subgroup analysis on the different sample collection sites (plaque, swab and saliva) was performed.ResultsFifteen cross-sectional studies were included for the qualitative assessment and nine studies for meta-analysis. Regarding the quality assessment, all included studies were rated as 'fair' or 'good'. Children with the presence of oral C. albicans had 6.51 times as likely, to have ECC experience, compared to those without C. albicans (95% CI: 4.948.57, p<0.01). The odds of experiencing ECC in children with C. albicans versus those without C. albicans were 6.69 for plaque, 6.3 for oral swab, and 5.26 for salivary samples.ConclusionsChildren with oral C. albicans have higher odds of experiencing ECC, compared to children without C. albicans.

Indexed as

Dental CariesDental PlaqueCandidaCandida albicansChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID30573860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.