Trial reportSpinal cord2019
Re-inventing yourself after spinal cord injury: a site-specific randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Spinal cord, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05279989 (Healthy Weight and Stress Management Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Healthy Weight and Stress Management Study
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Peer-supported interventions for people with spinal cord injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions to improve mental wellbeing.Nature human behaviour · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of a self-efficacy-centered self-management program on neurogenic bladder after spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled trial.Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS · 2025Trial
- Article
- The feasibility and effect of a peer-facilitated, remote handcycling sport program for aging adults with spinal cord injury or disease: a mixed methods case series.Spinal cord series and cases · 2025Article
- The Swedish version of the Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale (s-MSES) - translation process and psychometric properties in a community setting.Spinal cord · 2024Article
- Psychological Screening, Standards and Spinal Cord Injury: Introducing Change in NHS England Commissioned Services.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- The Value in Mental Health Screening for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: What Patients Tell Us.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
designParallel-arm randomized controlled trial comparing an interactive group format versus a no-intervention control.
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of a replicable group treatment program for improving self-efficacy after spinal cord injury (SCI) in a single center cohort of adults.
settingRegional SCI center.
methodsParticipants included 81 individuals with SCI who were at least 4 weeks post-discharge from initial rehabilitation. Those randomized to treatment participated in six interactive learning sessions (2 hours each, one session per week) with structured and facilitated group interactions to improve self-efficacy. A wait-list control group was followed at matching time points for all outcome measures. The primary outcome measure was the Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale (MSES); secondary outcomes were the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES); Diener Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS); Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools - Objective (PART-O); Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9); and General Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7).
resultsIndividuals in the Treatment group had greater increases in MSES scores from baseline to immediately post-intervention (6 weeks) than the Control group, but that difference did not remain significant after controlling for multiple comparisons. However, the improvement in the treatment group relative to the control group was not maintained through follow-up at 30 weeks. There was no evidence of an immediate or sustained treatment effect on any of the secondary outcomes.
conclusionsSelf-efficacy improved for participants with SCI in the Treatment group, however, this improvement was not significant or maintained on follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.