Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30573684›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2019

Inhibition of checkpoint kinase 1 following gemcitabine-mediated S phase arrest results in CDC7- and CDK2-dependent replication catastrophe.

Nicholas J H Warren, Alan Eastman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Improved Antitumor Efficiency ofInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Article
  3. Targeting replication stress in cancer therapy.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas J H WarrenFrom the Department of Molecular and Systems Biology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756.
Alan EastmanFrom the Department of Molecular and Systems Biology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756 alan.r.eastman@dartmouth.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8044-3092
Dartmouth College · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Mechanisms of Sensitivity to Cell Cycle Checkpoint Kinase InhibitorsR01CA117874 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI EASTMAN, ALAN R · 2007 to 2017
$3.0M
Olympus FV1200 Near Infrared Confocal MicroscopeS10OD021616 · OD · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI STAN, RADU VIRGIL · 2016 to 2016
$321k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R01 CA117874NIH HHS S10 OD021616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining DNA-damaging drugs with DNA checkpoint inhibitors is an emerging strategy to manage cancer. Checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitors (CHK1is) sensitize most cancer cell lines to DNA-damaging drugs and also elicit single-agent cytotoxicity in 15% of cell lines. Consequently, combination therapy may be effective in a broader patient population. Here, we characterized the molecular mechanism of sensitization to gemcitabine by the CHK1i MK8776. Brief gemcitabine incubation irreversibly inhibited ribonucleotide reductase, depleting dNTPs, resulting in durable S phase arrest. Addition of CHK1i 18 h after gemcitabine elicited cell division cycle 7 (CDC7)- and cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2)-dependent reactivation of the replicative helicase, but did not reinitiate DNA synthesis due to continued lack of dNTPs. Helicase reactivation generated extensive single-strand (ss)DNA that exceeded the protective capacity of the ssDNA-binding protein, replication protein A. The subsequent cleavage of unprotected ssDNA has been termed replication catastrophe. This mechanism did not occur with concurrent CHK1i plus gemcitabine treatment, providing support for delayed administration of CHK1i in patients. Alternative mechanisms of CHK1i-mediated sensitization to gemcitabine have been proposed, but their role was ruled out; these mechanisms include premature mitosis, inhibition of homologous recombination, and activation of double-strand break repair nuclease (MRE11). In contrast, single-agent activity of CHK1i was MRE11-dependent and was prevented by lower concentrations of a CDK2 inhibitor. Hence, both pathways require CDK2 but appear to depend on different CDK2 substrates. We conclude that a small-molecule inhibitor of CHK1 can elicit at least two distinct, context-dependent mechanisms of cytotoxicity in cancer cells.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2DeoxycytidineDNA ReplicationDNA, Single-StrandedGemcitabineHumansPC-3 CellsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesPyrazolesPyrimidinesS Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsCDC7 protein, humanCDK2 protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1CHEK1 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2DeoxycytidineDNA, Single-StrandedGemcitabineMK-8776Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesPyrazolesPyrimidinescancercell cyclecell division cycle 7-related protein kinase (Cdc7)Chk1cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)DNA-damage responsegemcitabinereplication catastrophesingle-strand binding protein RPA

Identifiers

PMID30573684
PMCPMC6369309
OpenAlexW2905875418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.