Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30573488›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Factors affecting the acceptability of isoniazid preventive therapy among healthcare providers in selected HIV clinics in Nairobi County, Kenya: a qualitative study.

Elvis Omondi Achach Wambiya, Martin Atela, Ejemai Eboreime, Latifat Ibisomi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Elvis Omondi Achach WambiyaResearch unit, African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-4149-3417
Martin AtelaResearch Uptake & Policy Engagement Unit, Partnership for African Social & Governance Research, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ejemai EboreimeSchool of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Latifat IbisomiSchool of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZAUniversity of Nairobi · KE

Funding

Wits-UNC Partnership: Expanding Capacity in HIV Implementation Science in South AfricaD43TW009774 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PETTIFOR, AUDREY, RAMASWAMY, ROHIT · 2014 to 2023
$3.0M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite being globally recommended as an effective intervention in tuberculosis (TB) prevention among people living with HIV, isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) implementation remains suboptimal, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. This study explored the factors influencing the acceptability of IPT among healthcare providers in selected HIV clinics in Nairobi County, Kenya, a high HIV/TB burden country.

designA qualitative study was conducted using in-depth interviews with healthcare providers in selected HIV clinics. All conversations were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic approach.

settingThe study was conducted in the HIV clinics of three purposefully selected public healthcare facilities in Nairobi County, Kenya between February 2017 and April 2017.

participantsEighteen purposefully selected healthcare providers (clinicians, nurses, pharmacists and counsellors) working in the HIV clinics participated in the study.

resultsProvider acceptability of IPT was influenced by factors relating to the organisational context, provider training on IPT and their perception on its efficacy, length and clarity of IPT guidelines and standard operation procedures, as well as structural factors (policy, physical and work environment). Inadequate high-level commitment and support for the IPT programme by programme managers and policy-makers were found to be the major barriers to successful IPT implementation in our study context.

conclusionThis study provides insight into the complexity of factors affecting the IPT implementation in Kenya. Ensuring optimal acceptability of IPT among healthcare providers will require an expanded depth of engagement by policy-makers and IPT programme managers with both providers and patients, as well as on-the-job design specific actions to support providers in implementation. Such high-level commitment and support are consequently essential for quality delivery of the intervention.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelTuberculosisAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAntitubercular AgentsEvaluation Studies as TopicHealth Services MisuseHIV InfectionsHumansIsoniazidKenyaQuality ImprovementAntitubercular AgentsIsoniazidHIV & AIDSpublic healthqualitative researchtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID30573488
PMCPMC6303693
OpenAlexW2903906957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.