Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30573451›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2018

Remote Patient Monitoring and Telemedicine in Neonatal and Pediatric Settings: Scoping Literature Review.

Farzan Sasangohar, Elise Davis, Bita A Kash, Sohail R Shah

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05245747 (Vitls Feasibility Physiologic Monitoring), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05245747 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Vitls Feasibility Physiologic Monitoring

TypeobservationalSponsorChildren's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled20ConditionsVital Signs, Pediatrics, Remote MonitoringArmsVitls Tego Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Farzan SasangoharIndustrial and Systems Engineering, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9962-5470
Elise Davis *National Science Foundation Center for Health Organization Transformation, Department of Health Policy and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0125-7268
Bita A KashNational Science Foundation Center for Health Organization Transformation, Department of Health Policy and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9491-6815
Sohail R ShahDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9984-2491
Houston Methodist · USBaylor College of Medicine · USU.S. National Science Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelemedicine and telehealth solutions are emerging rapidly in health care and have the potential to decrease costs for insurers, providers, and patients in various settings. Pediatric populations that require specialty care are disadvantaged socially or economically or have chronic health conditions that will greatly benefit from results of studies utilizing telemedicine technologies. This paper examines the emerging trends in pediatric populations as part of a systematic literature review and provides a scoping review of the type, extent, and quantity of research available.

objectiveThis paper aims to examine the role of remote patient monitoring (RPM) and telemedicine in neonatal and pediatric settings. Findings can be used to identify strengths, weaknesses, and gaps in the field. The identification of gaps will allow for interventions or research to improve health care quality and costs.

methodsA systematic literature review is being conducted to gather an adequate amount of relevant research for telehealth in pediatric populations. The fields of RPM and telemedicine are not yet very well established by the health care services sector, and definitions vary across health care systems; thus, the terms are not always defined similarly throughout the literature. Three databases were scoped for information for this specific review, and 56 papers were included for review.

resultsThree major telemedicine trends emerged from the review of 45 relevant papers-RPM, teleconsultation, and monitoring patients within the hospital, but without contact-thus, decreasing the likelihood of infection or other adverse health effects.

conclusionsWhile the current telemedicine approaches show promise, limited studied conditions and small sample sizes affect generalizability, therefore, warranting further research. The information presented can inform health care providers of the most widely implemented, studied, and effective forms of telemedicine for patients and their families and the telemedicine initiatives that are most cost efficient for health systems. While the focus of this review is to summarize some telehealth applications in pediatrics, we have also presented research studies that can inform providers about the importance of data sharing of remote monitoring data between hospitals. Further reports will be developed to inform health systems as the systematic literature review continues.

Indexed as

Monitoring, PhysiologicPediatricsRemote ConsultationTelemedicineChildDelivery of Health CareHumansInfant, Newbornneonatalpediatricremote patient monitoringtelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID30573451
PMCPMC6320401
OpenAlexW2891859491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.