Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30573357›Full record

SynthesisVaccine2019

Barriers and enablers to adolescent self-consent for vaccination: A mixed-methods evidence synthesis.

Harriet Fisher, Sarah Harding, Matthew Hickman, John Macleod, Suzanne Audrey

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Vaccine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Adolescent Self-Consent for COVID-19 Vaccination: Views of Healthcare Workers and Their Adolescent Children on Vaccination Autonomy.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Tools used to assay genomic instability in cancers and cancer meiomitosis.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Harriet FisherPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Harriet.Fisher@bristol.ac.uk.
Sarah HardingPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Matthew HickmanPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
John MacleodPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Suzanne AudreyPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0416-20013Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe recent global expansion of routine adolescent vaccination programmes has the potential to protect young people against infectious diseases and improve their health. Although the legal framework in many countries permits young people to consent for vaccinations if competent, lack of written parental consent can still prevent uptake. We aimed to review systematically the associated barriers and enablers to implementation of adolescent self-consent procedures.

methodsA comprehensive search strategy of ten databases from inception to June 2018 was undertaken to identify relevant qualitative and quantitative studies. Titles, abstracts and full texts were assessed for eligibility, and the methodological quality of eligible primary studies evaluated. Thematic synthesis methods were used to interpret and combine qualitative data, and to identify overarching themes as well as similarities and differences within themes. Quantitative data were summarised and, because the data were sufficiently similar in focus, were integrated within the qualitative framework.

resultsTwenty-five publications related to 23 studies were included. Three themes were identified which related to the policy framework, protection, and self-determination. Despite supportive national policy frameworks, implementation of adolescent self-consent procedures can be prevented by local policies, professionals' misunderstandings of the legal framework and the context in which the vaccination programme is delivered. Motivation to protect young people's health increased acceptability of adolescent self-consent, but implementation might be prevented to protect the reputation of professionals or relationships with parents. Further, maintaining the role of parents as decision-makers for their child's healthcare was frequently prioritised over enabling young people's autonomy to consent.

conclusionsBarriers to the implementation of adolescent self-consent procedures have implications for young people's health and uptake of vaccination programmes. There is a need to clarify the policy framework and challenge the primacy of parental consent. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017084509.

Indexed as

Decision MakingInformed Consent By MinorsAdolescentDelivery of Health CareHumansMotivationParental ConsentParentsProspective StudiesQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationAdolescentsMixed methodsSelf-consentSystematic reviewVaccination

Identifiers

PMID30573357
PMCPMC6453814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.