SynthesisVaccine2019
Barriers and enablers to adolescent self-consent for vaccination: A mixed-methods evidence synthesis.
Synthesis in Vaccine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors associated with adolescent HPV vaccination in the U.S.: A systematic review of reviews and multilevel framework to inform intervention development.Preventive medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Factors influencing vaccine hesitancy among United Kingdom adolescents in a senior high school environment and actions to address it.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Enablers to high vaccination uptake among a disadvantaged minority population: a qualitative study of the Arab population of Israel.Israel journal of health policy research · 2024Article
- Ethical issues in vaccine trial participation by adolescents: qualitative insights on family decision making from a human papillomavirus vaccine trial in Tanzania.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Applying the COM-B behaviour model to understand factors which impact 15-16 year old students' ability to protect themselves against acquirement of Human Papilloma virus (HPV) in Northern Ireland, UK.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Decision-Making about COVID-19 Vaccines among Health Care Workers and Their Adolescent Children.Western journal of nursing research · 2023Article
- Adolescent Self-Consent for COVID-19 Vaccination: Views of Healthcare Workers and Their Adolescent Children on Vaccination Autonomy.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2023Article
- Adolescent girls' recommendations for the design of a human papillomavirus vaccination program in Sindh, Pakistan: a qualitative study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Human papillomavirus vaccine communication materials for young people in English-speaking countries: A content analysis.Health education journal · 2022Article
- Tools used to assay genomic instability in cancers and cancer meiomitosis.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2022Review
- Impact of new consent procedures on uptake of the schools-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- HPV vaccine promotion: Snapshot of two health departments during the COVID-19 pandemic.Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.) · 2021Article
- Article
- Egyptian patients'/guardians' experiences and perception about clinical informed consent and its purpose: Cross sectional study.PloS one · 2021Article
- Suboptimal uptake of meningococcal vaccines among older adolescents: Barriers, solutions, and future research directions.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020Article
- Young women's autonomy and information needs in the schools-based HPV vaccination programme: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe recent global expansion of routine adolescent vaccination programmes has the potential to protect young people against infectious diseases and improve their health. Although the legal framework in many countries permits young people to consent for vaccinations if competent, lack of written parental consent can still prevent uptake. We aimed to review systematically the associated barriers and enablers to implementation of adolescent self-consent procedures.
methodsA comprehensive search strategy of ten databases from inception to June 2018 was undertaken to identify relevant qualitative and quantitative studies. Titles, abstracts and full texts were assessed for eligibility, and the methodological quality of eligible primary studies evaluated. Thematic synthesis methods were used to interpret and combine qualitative data, and to identify overarching themes as well as similarities and differences within themes. Quantitative data were summarised and, because the data were sufficiently similar in focus, were integrated within the qualitative framework.
resultsTwenty-five publications related to 23 studies were included. Three themes were identified which related to the policy framework, protection, and self-determination. Despite supportive national policy frameworks, implementation of adolescent self-consent procedures can be prevented by local policies, professionals' misunderstandings of the legal framework and the context in which the vaccination programme is delivered. Motivation to protect young people's health increased acceptability of adolescent self-consent, but implementation might be prevented to protect the reputation of professionals or relationships with parents. Further, maintaining the role of parents as decision-makers for their child's healthcare was frequently prioritised over enabling young people's autonomy to consent.
conclusionsBarriers to the implementation of adolescent self-consent procedures have implications for young people's health and uptake of vaccination programmes. There is a need to clarify the policy framework and challenge the primacy of parental consent. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017084509.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.