Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30573328›Full record

ArticlePediatric neurology2019

Impaired Visual Search in Children with Rett Syndrome.

Susan A Rose, Sam Wass, Jeffery J Jankowski, Judith F Feldman, Aleksandra Djukic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan A RoseDepartment of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York. Electronic address: susan.rose@einstein.yu.edu.
Sam WassDepartment of Psychology, University of East London, London, England, UK.
Jeffery J JankowskiDepartment of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York; Department of Social Sciences, Queensborough Community College/CUNY, Bayside, New York.
Judith F FeldmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York.
Aleksandra DjukicDepartment of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York; Rett Syndrome Center, Department of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York.
Montefiore Medical Center · USChildren's Hospital at Montefiore · USQueensborough Community College, CUNY · USUniversity of East London · GB

Funding

Support for the Rose F. Kennedy IDDRCU54HD090260 · NICHD · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI GREALLY, JOHN · 2016 to 2020
$6.0M
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aims to investigate selective attention in Rett syndrome, a severely disabling neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations in the X-linked MECP2 gene.

methodThe sample included 28 females with Rett syndrome (RTT) and 32 age-matched typically developing controls. We used a classic search task, in conjunction with eye-tracking technology. Each trial included the target and several distractors. The distractors varied in number and differed from targets in either a "single feature" (color or shape), creating a pop-out effect, or in a "conjunction of features" (color and shape), requiring serial search. Children searched for the target in arrays containing five or nine objects; trials ended when the target was fixated (or 4000 ms elapsed).

resultsChildren with Rett syndrome had more difficulty finding the target than typically developing children in both conditions (success rates less than 50% versus 80%) and their success rates were little influenced by display size or age. Even when successful, children with RTT took significantly longer to respond (392 to 574 ms longer), although saccadic latency differences were observed only in the single-feature condition. Both groups showed the expected slowing of saccadic reaction times for larger arrays in the conjunction-feature condition. Search failures in RTT were not related to symptom severity.

conclusionsOur findings provide the first evidence that selective attention, the ability to focus on or select a particular element or object in the environment, is compromised by Rett syndrome. They reinforce the notion that gaze-based tasks hold promise for quantifying the cognitive phenotype of RTT.

Indexed as

AttentionChildChild, PreschoolEye Movement MeasurementsFemaleHumansPattern Recognition, VisualRett SyndromeSpace PerceptionChildrenEye-trackingRett syndromeSearchSelective attention

Identifiers

PMID30573328
PMCPMC6397679
OpenAlexW2896322449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.