ArticleBiophysical journal2019
Experimental and Theoretical Explorations of Traveling Waves and Tuning in the Bushcricket Ear.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanical network equivalence between the katydid and mammalian inner ears.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- A numerical approach to investigating the mechanisms behind tonotopy in the bush-cricket inner-ear.Frontiers in insect science · 2022Article
- Tuned vibration modes in a miniature hearing organ: Insights from the bushcricket.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Comparative micromechanics of bushcricket ears with and without a specialized auditory fovea region in the crista acustica.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to detect airborne sound is essential for many animals. Examples from the inner ear of mammals and bushcrickets demonstrate that similar detection strategies evolved in taxonomically distant species. Both mammalian and bushcricket ears possess a narrow strip of sensory tissue that exhibits an anatomical gradient and traveling wave motion responses used for frequency discrimination. We measured pressure and motion in the bushcricket ear to investigate physical properties, stiffness, and mass, which govern the mechanical responses to sound. As in the mammalian cochlea, sound-induced fluid pressure and motion responses were tonotopically organized along the longitudinal axis of the crista acustica, the bushcricket's hearing organ. The fluid pressure at the crista and crista motion were used to calculate the acoustic impedance of the organ-bounded fluid mass (Z
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.