Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30572891›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2018

Characterizing patient compliance over six months in remote digital trials of Parkinson's and Huntington disease.

Shani Cohen, Zeev Waks, Jordan J Elm, Mark Forrest Gordon, Igor D Grachev, Leehee Navon-Perry, Shai Fine, Iris Grossman, Spyros Papapetropoulos, Juha-Matti Savola

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02494778 (A Multi-Center, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Pridopidine in Patients With Huntington's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02494778 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Multi-Center, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Pridopidine in Patients With Huntington's Disease (Open PRIDE-HD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorPrileniaRan2015 to 2018Enrolled248ConditionsHuntington's DiseaseArmsPridopidine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical utility of digital technologies in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Acceptability and satisfaction withFrontiers in psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shani CohenAdvanced Analytics Department, Intel, 94 Em Hamoshavot Road, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Zeev WaksAdvanced Analytics Department, Intel, 94 Em Hamoshavot Road, Petah Tikva, Israel. zeev.waks@intel.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5806-7000
Jordan J ElmDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon St., Suite 303, PO Box 250835, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Mark Forrest GordonTeva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, 41 Moores Rd., Frazer, Petah Tikva, PA, 19355, USA.
Igor D GrachevGuide Pharmaceutical Consulting, LLC, Millstone Township, NJ, 08535, USA.
Leehee Navon-PerryTeva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, 12 Hatrufa St, 4250483, Netanya, Israel.
Shai FineData Science Institute, Interdisciplinary Center, 1 Kanfei Nesharim St, 4610101, Herzliya, Israel.
Iris GrossmanCAMP4 Therapeutics, One Kendall Square, Bldg 1400 West, 3rd Floor, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Spyros PapapetropoulosMassachusetts General Hospital, Department of Neurology, Boston, USA.
Juha-Matti SavolaTeva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH, Elisabethenstrasse 15, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing number of clinical trials use various sensors and smartphone applications to collect data outside of the clinic or hospital, raising the question to what extent patients comply with the unique requirements of remote study protocols. Compliance is particularly important in conditions where patients are motorically and cognitively impaired. Here, we sought to understand patient compliance in digital trials of two such pathologies, Parkinson's disease (PD) and Huntington disease (HD).

methodsPatient compliance was assessed in two remote, six-month clinical trials of PD (n = 51, Clinician Input Study funded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research) and HD (n = 17, sponsored by Teva Pharmaceuticals). We monitored four compliance metrics specific to remote studies: smartphone app-based medication reporting, app-based symptoms reporting, the duration of smartwatch data streaming except while charging, and the performance of structured motor tasks at home.

resultsWhile compliance over time differed between the PD and HD studies, both studies maintained high compliance levels for their entire six month duration. None (- 1%) to a 30% reduction in compliance rate was registered for HD patients, and a reduction of 34 to 53% was registered for the PD study. Both studies exhibited marked changes in compliance rates during the initial days of enrollment. Interestingly, daily smartwatch data streaming patterns were similar, peaking around noon, dropping sharply in the late evening hours around 8 pm, and having a mean of 8.6 daily streaming hours for the PD study and 10.5 h for the HD study. Individual patients tended to have either high or low compliance across all compliance metrics as measured by pairwise correlation. Encouragingly, predefined schedules and app-based reminders fulfilled their intended effect on the timing of medication intake reporting and performance of structured motor tasks at home.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that maintaining compliance over long durations is feasible, promote the use of predefined app-based reminders, and highlight the importance of patient selection as highly compliant patients typically have a higher adherence rate across the different aspects of the protocol. Overall, these data can serve as a reference point for the design of upcoming remote digital studies.

trial registrationTrials described in this study include a sub-study of the Open PRIDE-HD Huntington's disease study (TV7820-CNS-20016), which was registered on July 7th, 2015, sponsored by Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd., and registered on Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02494778 and EudraCT as 2015-000904-24 .

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsPatient ComplianceSmartphoneAgedClinical Studies as TopicFemaleHumansHuntington DiseaseMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseaseResearch DesignTime FactorsComplianceDigital trialsHuntington diseaseParkinson’s diseaseRemote clinical trialsSensorsSmartphonesWearables

Identifiers

PMID30572891
PMCPMC6302308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.