ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2018
Characterizing patient compliance over six months in remote digital trials of Parkinson's and Huntington disease.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02494778 (A Multi-Center, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Pridopidine in Patients With Huntington's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-Center, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Pridopidine in Patients With Huntington's Disease (Open PRIDE-HD)
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Enhancing Enrollment and Adherence in Long-Term Wearable Research on Dementia: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.JMIR aging · 2025Pooled it
- Movement Disorders and Smart Wrist Devices: A Comprehensive Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- The use of digital outcome measures in clinical trials in rare neurological diseases: a systematic literature review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Pooled it
- An update on mobile applications collecting data among subjects with or at risk of Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review of methods used to conduct decentralised clinical trials.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Evaluation of Digital Technologies for Home-Based Assessment in People With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Continuous observation of Parkinsonian symptoms using symptom diaries & wearable accelerometry.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of digital technologies in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Digital Therapeutics for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Diseases: Current Trends and Future Perspectives.Medicinal research reviews · 2026Review
- Efficacy of an app for self-efficacy of patients with cancer through tailored information delivery and coaching: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Optimizing wrist-worn wearable compliance with insights from two Parkinson's disease cohort studies.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
- Assessing the clinical utility of inertial sensors for home monitoring in Parkinson's disease: a comprehensive review.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2024Article
- The digital signature of emergent tremor in Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2024Article
- iPREDICT: Characterization of Asthma Triggers and Selection of Digital Technology to Predict Changes in Disease Control.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2024Article
- Compliance Challenges in a Longitudinal COVID-19 Cohort Using Wearables for Continuous Monitoring: Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Observational
- Wearable device and smartphone data quantify ALS progression and may provide novel outcome measures.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- A Remote Digital Monitoring Platform to Assess Cognitive and Motor Symptoms in Huntington Disease: Cross-sectional Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Acceptability and satisfaction withFrontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Evaluating the Use of Digital Biomarkers to Test Treatment Effects on Cognition and Movement in Patients with Lewy Body Dementia.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA growing number of clinical trials use various sensors and smartphone applications to collect data outside of the clinic or hospital, raising the question to what extent patients comply with the unique requirements of remote study protocols. Compliance is particularly important in conditions where patients are motorically and cognitively impaired. Here, we sought to understand patient compliance in digital trials of two such pathologies, Parkinson's disease (PD) and Huntington disease (HD).
methodsPatient compliance was assessed in two remote, six-month clinical trials of PD (n = 51, Clinician Input Study funded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research) and HD (n = 17, sponsored by Teva Pharmaceuticals). We monitored four compliance metrics specific to remote studies: smartphone app-based medication reporting, app-based symptoms reporting, the duration of smartwatch data streaming except while charging, and the performance of structured motor tasks at home.
resultsWhile compliance over time differed between the PD and HD studies, both studies maintained high compliance levels for their entire six month duration. None (- 1%) to a 30% reduction in compliance rate was registered for HD patients, and a reduction of 34 to 53% was registered for the PD study. Both studies exhibited marked changes in compliance rates during the initial days of enrollment. Interestingly, daily smartwatch data streaming patterns were similar, peaking around noon, dropping sharply in the late evening hours around 8 pm, and having a mean of 8.6 daily streaming hours for the PD study and 10.5 h for the HD study. Individual patients tended to have either high or low compliance across all compliance metrics as measured by pairwise correlation. Encouragingly, predefined schedules and app-based reminders fulfilled their intended effect on the timing of medication intake reporting and performance of structured motor tasks at home.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that maintaining compliance over long durations is feasible, promote the use of predefined app-based reminders, and highlight the importance of patient selection as highly compliant patients typically have a higher adherence rate across the different aspects of the protocol. Overall, these data can serve as a reference point for the design of upcoming remote digital studies.
trial registrationTrials described in this study include a sub-study of the Open PRIDE-HD Huntington's disease study (TV7820-CNS-20016), which was registered on July 7th, 2015, sponsored by Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd., and registered on Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02494778 and EudraCT as 2015-000904-24 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.