Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30572865›Full record

SynthesisBMC ophthalmology2018

Association between sunlight exposure and risk of age-related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis.

Hongjie Zhou, Huina Zhang, Aiqing Yu, Jiajun Xie

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Modeling complex age-related eye disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The Blue Light Hazard Versus Blue Light Hype.American journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hongjie ZhouHangzhou Hospital for the Prevention and Treatment of Occupational Diseases, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China. zhjwood@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7156-188X
Huina ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, the 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
Aiqing YuHangzhou Hospital for the Prevention and Treatment of Occupational Diseases, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
Jiajun XieDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, the 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

The Medical and Health Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province 2018242126Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China LQ19H120006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA substantial number of epidemiological studies have investigated the possible associations between sunlight exposure and Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD), but the results from studies are inconsistent. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between sunlight exposure and the risk of AMD.

methodsRelevant studies were searched using databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science database. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled covariates-adjusted odds ratio (OR). Subgroup analyses based on study design, stage of AMD, method of exposure assessment, and study latitude were carried out. The heterogeneity across the studies was tested, as was publication bias.

resultsFourteen eligible studies including 43,934 individuals based on the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The pooled OR for sunlight exposure and AMD was 1.10 (95% CI = 0.98-1.23). In addition, similar insignificant results were observed in further subgroup analyses based on stage of AMD, method of exposure assessment, and study latitude. Sun-avoidance behavior did not decrease the risk of AMD (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.76-1.67). Moderate heterogeneity was observed in most of analyses.

conclusionThe results indicate that sunlight exposure may not be associated with increased risk of AMD based on current published data.

Indexed as

BiasHumansMacular DegenerationOdds RatioResearch DesignRisk FactorsSunlightMacular degenerationMeta-analysisRisk factorSunlight

Identifiers

PMID30572865
PMCPMC6302450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.