Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30572729›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2019

Current landscape of nonmedical vaccination exemptions in the United States: impact of policy changes.

Robert A Bednarczyk, Adrian R King, Ariana Lahijani, Saad B Omer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. COVID-19 vaccination policy dataset.Nature human behaviour · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert A Bednarczyka Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health , Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6812-0928
Adrian R Kinga Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health , Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Ariana Lahijania Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health , Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Saad B Omera Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health , Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA.

Funding

Impact of eliminating nonmedical exemptions in CaliforniaR01AI125405 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, JASON LEE · 2016 to 2020
$3.8M
A Practice-Provider-Parent-Adolescent intervention to increase HPV vaccinationK01AI106961 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BEDNARCZYK, ROBERT A. · 2014 to 2017
$471k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI106961NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the United States, high childhood vaccination coverage has reduced the morbidity and mortality due to vaccine-preventable diseases. The success of vaccination programs in achieving this high coverage is due, in part, to vaccination mandates for school entry. All states have such mandates, but there is heterogeneity across the states in the allowance of non-medical exemptions (e.g. religious or personal belief exemptions) to these mandates. AREAS COVERED: We examine historical trends in non-medical exemption prevalence in the US, discuss recent state-level policy changes that may impact non-medical exemption prevalence, and review recent studies on the association between non-medical exemptions and infectious disease outbreaks. EXPERT COMMENTARY: State-level implementation of mandates, and related allowances for medical and non-medical exemptions, varies greatly across the United States. Non-medical exemption rates have increased over the last two decades, with an increased risk of disease outbreaks in clusters of children with non-medical exemptions due to differences in state laws. Recent efforts to address non-medical exemption rates range from incorporating additional administrative requirements for exemptions and disallowance of any non-medical exemptions. Continued monitoring is needed to evaluate the impact of these changes on exemption rates, to develop optimal childhood vaccination policy across the United States.

Indexed as

ChildDisease OutbreaksHealth PolicyHumansImmunization ProgramsSchoolsUnited StatesVaccinationVaccination CoverageVaccination RefusalVaccinesVaccinesexemptionsnon-medical exemptionsschool entrystate lawVaccination mandates

Identifiers

PMID30572729
PMCPMC6386772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.