Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30572551›Full record

ArticleMedicine2018

Therapeutic efficacy of latanoprost on primary open angle glaucoma: A protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trial.

Hai-Yan Dai, Jia-Ying Wang, Yan-Qing Li, Hui-Jie Diao, Li Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hai-Yan DaiSecond Ward of Ophthalmology Department.
Jia-Ying WangFirst Ward of Ophthalmology Department.
Yan-Qing LiFirst Ward of Ophthalmology Department.
Hui-Jie DiaoFirst Ward of Ophthalmology Department.
Li ZhangDepartment of Research, The Affiliated Hongqi Hospital of Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, China.
Health First · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLatanoprost is quiet new formulation that is approved for the treatment of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). However, no updated systematic review has addressed its efficacy for POAG. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to assess its efficacy and safety for the treatment of patients with POAG.

methodsThis study will search the databases of CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDILINE, CINAHL, AMED and Chinese databases without language restrictions from their inception to the present. It will only include RCTs of latanoprost for POAG. The quality of the included RCTs will be evaluated by the tool of Cochrane risk of bias. The primary outcomes will be measured by the mean IOP reduction from baseline to the endpoint. The secondary outcomes will be assessed by the mean IOP, adjusted mean IOP reduction at each time point, quality of life, and adverse events. The RevMan V.5.3 software will be used to compute the data synthesis carefully if the meta-analysis is allowed. The summary results of the included RCTs will be conducted by using the models of random-effects or fixed-effects based.

resultsThe results of this study will be published at the peer-reviewed journals. It will provide evidence to determine the efficacy and safety of latanoprost for POAG.

conclusionThe results of this study will provide helpful evidence for both clinicians and patients, and for the health policy makers to refer for the policy or guideline making. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018115416.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicAntihypertensive AgentsGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureLatanoprostAntihypertensive AgentsLatanoprost

Identifiers

PMID30572551
PMCPMC6320140
OpenAlexW2906578024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.