Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30572550›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2018

Coagulation markers and echocardiography predict atrial fibrillation, malignancy or recurrent stroke after cryptogenic stroke.

Deandrea Ellis, Srikant Rangaraju, Alexander Duncan, Michael Hoskins, Syed Ali Raza, Haseeb Rahman, Melanie Winningham, Samir Belagaje, Nicolas Bianchi, Ghada A Mohamed and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Deandrea EllisDepartment of Neurology.
Srikant RangarajuDepartment of Neurology.
Alexander DuncanDepartment of Pathology.
Michael HoskinsDepartment of Cardiology, Emory University.
Syed Ali RazaDepartment of Neurology.
Haseeb RahmanDepartment of Neurology.
Melanie WinninghamDepartment of Neurology, Novant Health.
Samir BelagajeDepartment of Neurology.
Nicolas BianchiDepartment of Neurology.
Ghada A MohamedDepartment of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital.
Mahmoud ObideenDepartment of Neurology.
Vera SharashidzeDepartment of Neurology.
Trina BelairDepartment of Neurology.
Laura HenriquezDepartment of Neurology.
Fadi NahabDepartment of Neurology & Pediatrics, Emory University, United States.
Emory University · USHenry Ford Hospital · USNovant Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the utility of left atrial volume index (LAVI) and markers of coagulation and hemostatic activation (MOCHA) in cryptogenic stroke (CS) patients to identify those more likely to have subsequent diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), malignancy or recurrent stroke during follow-up.Consecutive CS patients who met embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) who underwent transthoracic echocardiography and outpatient cardiac monitoring following stroke were identified from the Emory cardiac registry. In a subset of consecutive patients, d-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1.2, thrombin-antithrombin complex and fibrin monomer (MOCHA panel) were obtained ≥2 weeks post-stroke and repeated ≥4 weeks later if abnormal; abnormal MOCHA panel was defined as ≥2 elevated markers which did not normalize when repeated. We assessed the predictive abilities of LAVI and the MOCHA panel to identify patients with subsequent diagnosis of AF, malignancy, recurrent stroke or the composite outcome during follow-up.Of 94 CS patients (mean age 64 ± 15 years, 54% female, 63% non-white, mean follow-up 1.4 ± 0.8 years) who underwent prolonged cardiac monitoring, 15 (16%) had new AF. Severe LA enlargement (vs normal) was associated with AF (P < .06). In 42 CS patients with MOCHA panel testing (mean follow-up 1.1 ± 0.6 years), 14 (33%) had the composite outcome and all had abnormal MOCHA. ROC analysis showed LAVI and abnormal MOCHA together outperformed either test alone with good predictive ability for the composite outcome (AUC 0.84).We report the novel use of the MOCHA panel in CS patients to identify a subgroup of patients more likely to have occult AF, occult malignancy or recurrent stroke during follow-up. A normal MOCHA panel identified a subgroup of CS patients at low risk for recurrent stroke on antiplatelet therapy. Further study is warranted to evaluate whether the combination of an elevated LAVI and abnormal MOCHA panel identifies a subgroup of CS patients who may benefit from early anticoagulation for secondary stroke prevention.

Indexed as

AgedAntithrombin IIIAtrial FibrillationBiomarkersBlood CoagulationBrain IschemiaEchocardiographyFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPeptide FragmentsPeptide HydrolasesProspective StudiesAntithrombin IIIantithrombin III-protease complexBiomarkersFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DfibrinmonomerPeptide FragmentsPeptide HydrolasesProthrombinprothrombin fragment 1.2

Identifiers

PMID30572550
PMCPMC6320212
OpenAlexW2906567973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.