ArticleMedicine2018
Fuling Sini decoction for patients with chronic heart failure: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of Tiaoqiheying decoction in the treatment of spasmodic pain and lipid metabolism after acute ischemic stroke.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Trial
- Homotherapy for Heteropathy: A Molecular Mechanism of Poria Sini Decoction for Treatment of Liver Cancer and Chronic Heart Failure.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2024Article
- Preclinical study of Shen Qi Li Xin formula in improving the development of chronic heart failure.Histology and histopathology · 2022Article
- Mechanism of tonifying-kidney Chinese herbal medicine in the treatment of chronic heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Uncovering Modern Clinical Applications of Fuzi and Fuzi-Based Formulas: A Nationwide Descriptive Study With Market Basket Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Cross-Talk between Gut Microbiota and the Heart: A New Target for the Herbal Medicine Treatment of Heart Failure?Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic heart failure (CHF) is one of the most important cardiovascular diseases worldly, with high morbidity and mortality. Fuling Sini decoction (FSD) has been used in the management of CHF widely in China, while its effective evidence is not clear. A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate FSD for CHF is lacking. Hence, we propose a protocol for systematic evaluation of its efficacy and safety for CHF.
methodsWe will search the following electronic databases from inception to October 2018, including EMBASE, Cochrane Center Registration Controlled trials (Cochrane Library), PubMed, Medline, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), and Wan-fang database. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of FSD alone or combined with other management for CHF will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen the literature and extract data according to the Cochrane Handbook method. The assessment of bias risk, data synthesis, subgroup analysis, and meta-analyses and finally meta-analysis will be performed by using RevMan V.5.3.5 software.
resultsThis systematic review will provide high-quality evidence and may be the first to evaluate efficacy and safety of FSD in the treatment of CHF.
conclusionThis systematic review will provide evidence for judging whether FSD is an effective management for CHF or not. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD 42018110210.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.